Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 158%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 128%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 173%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 131%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive473% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory29.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240905
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 25 '24 at 20:03
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 9700X-$320
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 5.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Memory 88.5
1-Core 237
2-Core 473
137% 266 Pts
4-Core 927
8-Core 1,800
162% 1,364 Pts
64-Core 2,389
148% 2,389 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 131%
Great: 131%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 561.09
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
120% Outstanding
Lighting 162
Reflection 231
Parallax 152
132% 182 fps
MRender 198
Gravity 128
Splatting 104
112% 143 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 120%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 1TB-$109
331GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4327 1700 1789 2097 2152 2116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
473% Outstanding
Read 2,092
Write 4,850
Mixed 3,604
SusWrite 2,364
736% 3,228 MB/s
4K Read 88.1
4K Write 279
4K Mixed 134
453% 167 MB/s
DQ Read 2,471
DQ Write 2,212
DQ Mixed 2,362
1,766% 2,349 MB/s
Poor: 275%
This bench: 473%
Great: 507%
Samsung MZNLN512HMJP-00000 512GB
401GB free
Firmware: MAV2100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 495 497 497 497 497 496 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 499
Mixed 403
SusWrite 496
108% 479 MB/s
4K Read 50.5
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 69.2
234% 83.4 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 366
DQ Mixed 372
281% 376 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 141%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX5M2N6400C36 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
185% Outstanding
MC Read 61.3
MC Write 65.9
MC Mixed 71
189% 66.1 GB/s
SC Read 56.2
SC Write 77.7
SC Mixed 66.2
191% 66.7 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 135%
This bench: 185%
Great: 203%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 165 27" 1280 720 AUS2401 VG249Q1R
Typical TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 482 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 413%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 419%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $2,444
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $220Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback