Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME X670E-PRO WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 244%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 228%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 119%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics211% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive384% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X670E-PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory17.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240905
Uptime37.9 Days
Run DateOct 31 '24 at 21:08
Run Duration322 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X-$199
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
119% Outstanding
Memory 86.6
1-Core 206
2-Core 405
121% 232 Pts
4-Core 810
8-Core 1,184
125% 997 Pts
64-Core 1,445
89% 1,445 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 119%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
211% Outstanding
Lighting 314
Reflection 276
Parallax 314
256% 301 fps
MRender 355
Gravity 247
Splatting 182
204% 261 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 211%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
283GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731030WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3305 987 279 333 411 392 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
384% Outstanding
Read 4,004
Write 3,668
Mixed 2,919
SusWrite 951
644% 2,885 MB/s
4K Read 62.3
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 72
262% 92.2 MB/s
DQ Read 2,209
DQ Write 1,631
DQ Mixed 1,860
1,407% 1,900 MB/s
Poor: 249%
This bench: 384%
Great: 623%
WDC WUH721816ALE6L4 16TB
8TB free
Firmware: PCGNW680
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 214 226 229 229 228 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
28% Poor
Read 310
Write 37.6
Mixed 96.6
SusWrite 225
37% 167 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 6.6
4K Mixed 0.8
6% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28%
Great: 65%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
71GB free
Firmware: UH5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 70 24 136 153 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 462
Write 179
Mixed 79.8
SusWrite 112
46% 208 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 27.3
4K Mixed 7.4
48% 16.8 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 46.6
DQ Mixed 5.6
24% 56.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 58%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$234
80GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 485 475 372 296 254 189 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 461
Mixed 416
SusWrite 345
97% 430 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 97.9
4K Mixed 56.9
189% 65.7 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 370
278% 371 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 116%
Great: 133%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$80
217GB free
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1192 1239 1240 1239 1238 1239 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
650% Outstanding
Read 8,159
Write 2.7
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 1231
494% 2,349 MB/s
4K Read 375
4K Write 94.6
4K Mixed 55.8
690% 175 MB/s
DQ Read 1,473
DQ Write 1,136
DQ Mixed 1,512
1,074% 1,374 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 650%
Great: 365%
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$150
1TB free
Firmware: 3B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3734 3760 3754 3778 3757 3771 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
512% Outstanding
Read 3026
Write 3876
Mixed 3,215
SusWrite 3,759
786% 3,469 MB/s
4K Read 67
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 88.4
286% 96.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1793
DQ Write 1,456
DQ Mixed 1,597
1,203% 1,615 MB/s
Poor: 286%
This bench: 512%
Great: 587%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-5600J3036D162x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
171% Outstanding
MC Read 59.4
MC Write 65.2
MC Mixed 62.2
178% 62.3 GB/s
SC Read 55
SC Write 60.5
SC Mixed 48.2
156% 54.6 GB/s
Latency 71
56% 71 ns
Poor: 135%
This bench: 171%
Great: 193%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 120 27" 1280 720 VSC3C3A XG270Q
Typical PRIME X670E-PRO WIFI Builds (Compare 156 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 413%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 419%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X670E-PRO WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $2,504
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $337WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback