Toshiba Qosmio X505

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba Qosmio X505 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA Qosmio X505
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20101210
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 21 '18 at 20:29
Run Duration	191 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	40%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220 13,149 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	54.6% Above average	Memory 87.8 1-Core 23.4 2-Core 49.5 40% 53.6 Pts	4-Core 119 8-Core 203 20% 161 Pts	64-Core 203 12% 203 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 360M 1,262 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Toshiba(1179 FF50) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.95 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	4.88% Terrible	Lighting 6.47 Reflection 7.23 Parallax 2.72 5% 5.47 fps	MRender 7.38 Gravity 4.5 Splatting 3.83 4% 5.24 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.88% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42 25,948 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 120 6801272 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 139801185492432 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1724 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 199 (B1) Unknown 0 0 2 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 128 129 545469300864 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 6801272 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 6801272 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 6801272 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 -138005889154972 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 4477 (EA) Unknown 0 0 3817 (F1) Unknown 0 0 3817 (F2) Unknown 0 0 11094	27.1% Poor	Read 183 Write 106 Mixed 135 31% 141 MB/s	4K Read 11.2 4K Write 21.7 4K Mixed 8.71 40% 13.9 MB/s	DQ Read 15.4 DQ Write 45.7 DQ Mixed 9.93 14% 23.7 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 82%
WD WD10TPVT-00H 1TB 1,893 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 433GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 209 195 2550 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5921 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 6981 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1944 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 420 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 160 160 122582 (C2) HDA temperature 119 94 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	35.2% Below average	Read 64.2 Write 58.6 Mixed 47 42% 56.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.09 4K Write 0.33 4K Mixed 0.05 16% 0.16 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 49%
Inateck 1TB 269 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 931GB free, PID 1066 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	13.2% Very poor	Read 29 Write 21.1 Mixed 24.2 31% 24.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.41 4K Mixed 0.2 56% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 667 MHz Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	33.7% Below average	MC Read 13.9 MC Write 10.5 MC Mixed 10.2 33% 11.5 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 7.4 SC Mixed 6.4 21% 7.27 GB/s	Latency 69.7 57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Qosmio X505 Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Qosmio X505

CPU
Core i7 Q 740Intel $190Bench 54%, 13,278 samples	20x
Core i7 Q 720Intel $220Bench 51%, 13,149 samples	14x
Core i5 M 430IntelBench 39%, 14,318 samples	8x

GPU
GeForce GTS 360MNvidiaBench 4%, 1,262 samples	35x
GeForce GTX 460MNvidiaBench 6%, 3,887 samples	18x
GeForce GTS 250MNvidiaBench 4%, 297 samples	3x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	2x
PLUS 480GBSandiskBench 48%, 58,990 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5673FH0-CF8 2x2GBSamsungBench 25%, 6,000 samples	7x
M471B5673EH1-CF8 2x2GBSamsungBench 25%, 2,358 samples	5x
M471B5273CH0-CF8 80CE M471B5673FH0-CF8 6GBUnknownBench 26%, 41 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $218

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353