Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z370M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics82.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive85.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z370M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171201
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateApr 07 '18 at 04:21
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Memory 95.5
1-Core 138
2-Core 267
94% 167 Pts
4-Core 485
8-Core 828
80% 657 Pts
64-Core 1153
71% 1153 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 100%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$449
CLim: 1631 MHz, MLim: 1827 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.71
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.3% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 88.3
Parallax 72.1
88% 89.4 fps
MRender 92.4
Gravity 100
Splatting 74.1
71% 88.9 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 87%
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Intel(8086 3E92) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4877
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
8.14% Terrible
Lighting 8.53
Reflection 12.2
Parallax 8.62
7% 9.77 fps
MRender 11.8
Gravity 7.7
Splatting 17.1
10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.14%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Read 504
Write 280
Mixed 306
80% 363 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 74.3
4K Mixed 21
128% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 41.5
86% 176 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 108%
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$79
4GB free
Firmware: 501ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 500
Write 121
Mixed 169
57% 263 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 15.8
4K Mixed 14.5
70% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 94.6
DQ Write 38.4
DQ Mixed 50
41% 61 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 87%
Seagate ST3300831AS 300GB
133GB free
Firmware: 3.02 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
33.4% Below average
Read 61.9
Write 54.6
Mixed 54.4
43% 56.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 0.85
4K Mixed 0.24
58% 0.49 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 37%
WD My Book 25DA 5TB
4TB free, PID 25da
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 174
Write 148
Mixed 124
184% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.87
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.26
97% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 24.5
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 25.3
68% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 55.7
72% 55.7 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,464 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock Z370M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $433
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback