Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory2.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 04 '18 at 16:51
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$175
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 78.1
1-Core 113
2-Core 194
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 693
64% 535 Pts
64-Core 922
57% 922 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140
XFX(1682 9270) 2GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.4.1
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
26.2% Poor
Lighting 33.3
Reflection 29.7
Parallax 39.8
27% 34.3 fps
MRender 27
Gravity 25.3
Splatting 35
24% 29.1 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 26%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370S 256GB-$110
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N1114H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 516
Write 292
Mixed 369
87% 392 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 64.4
4K Mixed 18.1
92% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 24.6
DQ Write 78.9
DQ Mixed 17.8
23% 40.4 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 114%
Toshiba MD04ACA600 6TB-$250
3TB free
Firmware: FS2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 168
Mixed 151
122% 162 MB/s
4K Read 3.13
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.31
204% 1.85 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 112%
Enmotus T00 FuzeDrive 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71
288GB free
Firmware: JKAOA20N Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 97.6
Write 84.9
Mixed 83.8
67% 88.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.25
64% 0.51 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT4G4DFS824A.C8FHP TS512MLH64V4H CT4G4DFS824A.C8FHP 12GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.9% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 18.2
56% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 19.4
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 84.1
48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 349 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $283
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback