Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics55.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory7.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 07 '18 at 10:42
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$175
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 78.4
1-Core 120
2-Core 238
80% 146 Pts
4-Core 460
8-Core 681
71% 571 Pts
64-Core 891
55% 891 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 82%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.9% Above average
Lighting 71.8
Reflection 74.3
Parallax 72.4
58% 72.8 fps
MRender 69.4
Gravity 59.2
Splatting 58.9
51% 62.5 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB (2017)-$129
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B35900WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 215 209 213 212 210 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 908
Write 671
Mixed 426
SusWrite 217
123% 556 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 89.9
4K Mixed 44.3
161% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 261
DQ Write 519
DQ Mixed 43.5
132% 275 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 116%
Great: 144%
Enmotus T00 FuzeDrive 2.5TB
2TB free
Firmware: 1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 294 295 294 293 294 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
80.7% Excellent
Read 495
Write 294
Mixed 290
SusWrite 293
76% 343 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 70.8
4K Mixed 32.2
115% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 146
116% 160 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 81%
Toshiba MD04ACA600 6TB-$250
3TB free
Firmware: FS2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 173 173 167 171 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 167
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 169
103% 142 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
332% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 112%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71
268GB free
Firmware: JKAOA20N
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 86 87 83 88 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 99.5
Write 97
Mixed 48.7
SusWrite 85.1
60% 82.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT4G4DFS824A.C8FHP TS512MLH64V4H CT4G4DFS824A.C8FHP 12GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.4% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 14.7
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 16
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 83.6
48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 349 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $283
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback