Supermicro X9SRE/X9SRE-3F/X9SRi/X9SRi-3F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemSupermicro X9SRE/X9SRE-3F/X9SRi/X9SRi-3F  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9SRE/X9SRE-3F/X9SRi/X9SRi-3F
Memory16.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140103
Uptime4 Days
Run DateJul 09 '18 at 07:41
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1660 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 87.3
1-Core 98
2-Core 191
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 580
57% 466 Pts
64-Core 701
43% 701 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Gigabyte(1458 3624) 3GB
CLim: 1359 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Lighting 62
Reflection 54.8
Parallax 71.5
50% 62.8 fps
MRender 71.3
Gravity 71.6
Splatting 52.8
52% 65.2 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$117
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM02.H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 390 417 365 362 359 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Read 460
Write 447
Mixed 358
SusWrite 381
93% 411 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 66.6
4K Mixed 34.9
119% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 87
112% 196 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 111%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
250GB free
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 99 99 99 100 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 91.5
Write 98.2
Mixed 76
SusWrite 99.2
67% 91.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
101% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 114%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
150GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 79 78 80 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 122
Write 115
Mixed 102
SusWrite 79.1
78% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
190% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 100%
Hitachi HUS726040AL 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: W907
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 178 183 174 178 184 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 184
Mixed 67
SusWrite 179
112% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.4
185% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 106%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965516-420.A00LF 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
55.1% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 18.6
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 12.4
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X9SRE/X9SRE-3F/X9SRi/X9SRi-3F Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Supermicro X9SRE/X9SRE-3F/X9SRi/X9SRi-3F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $91
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback