Asus H110M-A/M.2

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Speed boat	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	50.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	174% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-A/M.2 (all builds)
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160517
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 14 '18 at 21:56
Run Duration	240 Seconds
Run User	ISR-User
Background CPU	35%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$79 171,457 User benchmarks, average bench 61% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	77% Very good	Memory 88.7 1-Core 97 2-Core 185 72% 123 Pts	4-Core 378 8-Core 376 50% 377 Pts	64-Core 394 24% 394 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 3722) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 416.94 Performing below potential (45^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50.8% Above average	Lighting 61.2 Reflection 63.5 Parallax 56.5 50% 60.4 fps	MRender 67.7 Gravity 62.1 Splatting 63.5 53% 64.4 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 104GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 326 308 322 321 261 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	174% Outstanding	Read 1,057 Write 929 Mixed 498 SusWrite 322 156% 702 MB/s	4K Read 42.5 4K Write 139 4K Mixed 51 203% 77.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,058 DQ Write 1,214 DQ Mixed 836 713% 1,036 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 174% Great: 236%
Toshiba Q300 120GB 1,888 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 33GB free Firmware: SAFM11.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 76 72 74 74 56 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	75.1% Very good	Read 450 Write 396 Mixed 328 SusWrite 77.3 70% 312 MB/s	4K Read 28.9 4K Write 83 4K Mixed 35.7 134% 49.2 MB/s	DQ Read 348 DQ Write 165 DQ Mixed 166 147% 226 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 87%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 782GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 164 166 169 168 168 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 186 Write 174 Mixed 89.2 SusWrite 165 112% 154 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.7 172% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 109%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80 75,644 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 635GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 135 135 137 139 138 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	67.6% Good	Read 100 Write 95 Mixed 73.2 SusWrite 135 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 96%
WDC WD20 EARX-32PASB0 2TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 457GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 97 97 97 98 95 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	39.7% Below average	Read 88 Write 89 Mixed 83.5 SusWrite 95.6 122% 89 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 92% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 40%
ST3000DM 001-1ER166 3TB 134 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 2.7 2 1.9 3 5.4 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	29.8% Poor	Read 165 Write 120 Mixed 82.2 SusWrite 3.9 110% 92.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 73%
Lexar SD USB_3_0 Read 64GB 84 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 13GB free, PID b050 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 16 16 16 15 17 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	24.9% Poor	Read 72.5 Write 71.5 Mixed 70 SusWrite 15.8 75% 57.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.8 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 4.6 283% 4.2 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 24.9% Great: 48%
ST2000DM 001-1ER164 2TB 103 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 332GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 96 96 96 96 94 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	53.5% Above average	Read 187 Write 147 Mixed 87.5 SusWrite 94.5 163% 129 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 77%
Lexar MSD USB_3_0 Read 32GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 26GB free, PID b050 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 17 17 17 16 17 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	10% Very poor	Read 21.8 Write 6.5 Mixed 12 SusWrite 16.2 18% 14.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0 43% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 10% Great: 24%
WDC WD30 EZRZ-00GXCB0 3TB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 994GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 9.2 5.1 5.1 8 5.4 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	29.7% Poor	Read 136 Write 139 Mixed 108 SusWrite 8.3 125% 97.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 126% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905678-027.A00G 9905678-023.A00G 16GB 64 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	71.6% Very good	MC Read 26.4 MC Write 28.6 MC Mixed 21.4 73% 25.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.1 SC Write 26.7 SC Mixed 20.4 59% 20.7 GB/s	Latency 68.8 58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-A/M.2 Builds (Compare 3,122 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H110M-A/M.2

CPU
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	392x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	382x
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	353x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	400x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	348x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	217x

SSD
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston $89Bench 71%, 105,079 samples	115x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	115x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	69x

RAM
9905678-012.A00G 2x8GBKingstonBench 73%, 1,882 samples	56x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	53x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $46Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	49x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $295

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16