MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results


Gaming 90% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 105% UFO	Workstation 84% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	85.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	469% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C91
Motherboard	MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) (all builds)
Memory	26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210924
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 30 '21 at 11:01
Run Duration	467 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 5600-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$206 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	99.4% Outstanding	Memory 90.8 1-Core 156 2-Core 307 100% 185 Pts	4-Core 580 8-Core 948 93% 764 Pts	64-Core 1,131 70% 1,131 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 99.4% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 5600-XT-$300 112,731 User benchmarks, average bench 83% XFX(1682 5710) Ram: 6GB, Driver: 21.10.2 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	85.1% Excellent	Lighting 109 Reflection 125 Parallax 160 89% 131 fps	MRender 93.7 Gravity 114 Splatting 82.1 78% 96.5 fps
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 85.1% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black SN850 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$113 14,499 User benchmarks, average bench 395% 281GB free (System drive) Firmware: 611100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 4698 4690 2271 1631 1406 1165 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	469% Outstanding	Read 3,754 Write 4,673 Mixed 3,296 SusWrite 2,644 810% 3,592 MB/s	4K Read 78.2 4K Write 207 4K Mixed 101 357% 129 MB/s	DQ Read 1,179 DQ Write 936 DQ Mixed 1,064 794% 1,060 MB/s
Poor: 228% ↑ This bench: 469% Great: 595%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 72GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 325 325 325 323 324 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	123% Outstanding	Read 520 Write 498 Mixed 471 SusWrite 340 103% 457 MB/s	4K Read 44.5 4K Write 116 4K Mixed 60.9 207% 73.7 MB/s	DQ Read 389 DQ Write 362 DQ Mixed 371 280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 324GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 519 Write 497 Mixed 471 111% 496 MB/s	4K Read 44.3 4K Write 114 4K Mixed 60.6 205% 73.1 MB/s	DQ Read 389 DQ Write 363 DQ Mixed 372 280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 503GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 174 175 174 174 174 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	82.1% Excellent	Read 113 Write 85.6 Mixed 72.1 SusWrite 173 81% 111 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 205% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 82.1% Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 420GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 175 172 172 175 172 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	76% Very good	Read 93.1 Write 87 Mixed 62.5 SusWrite 171 76% 103 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 207% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 126 126 125 127 126 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	48.1% Average	Read 42 Write 71.5 Mixed 63.2 SusWrite 126 56% 75.6 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 51% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 163 163 162 157 158 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	74.1% Very good	Read 99.7 Write 121 Mixed 74.8 SusWrite 159 83% 114 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.1 79% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 126 127 127 125 126 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	56.8% Above average	Read 72.4 Write 89.1 Mixed 55.3 SusWrite 126 63% 85.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 63% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 90%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$59 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 528GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 126 128 127 127 128 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	74.9% Very good	Read 135 Write 119 Mixed 85.3 SusWrite 126 86% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 84%
HP SSD S 700 500GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 223% 465GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 35 35 35 35 35 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	77.8% Very good	Read 39.8 Write 39.6 Mixed 39 SusWrite 34.5 52% 38.2 MB/s	4K Read 13 4K Write 20 4K Mixed 11.7 1,126% 14.9 MB/s	DQ Read 13.2 DQ Write 20 DQ Mixed 12 1,137% 15.1 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 302%
WDC WD10 EZEX-60WN4A0 1TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 478GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 162 162 164 161 157 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	59.9% Above average	Read 120 Write 124 Mixed 106 SusWrite 158 176% 127 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 128% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 64%
WDC WD60 EDAZ-11BMZB0 6TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.2 0 0 0 19 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	56.3% Above average	Read 179 Write 174 Mixed 126 SusWrite 3.2 152% 121 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Write 9.3 4K Mixed 0.8 360% 4.83 MB/s	DQ Read 0.4 DQ Write 9.9 DQ Mixed 0.5 355% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 70%
WD easystore 2647 5TB 3,858 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 4TB free, PID 2647 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 111 109 110 111 110 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	72.6% Very good	Read 124 Write 110 Mixed 77.1 SusWrite 110 140% 105 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 9.9 4K Mixed 0.8 368% 3.97 MB/s	DQ Read 0.4 DQ Write 11.6 DQ Mixed 0.6 416% 4.2 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 66%
ST1000LM 035-1RK172 970GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 897GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	12.7% Very poor	Read 38.1 Write 37.8 Mixed 27 SusWrite 4.3 34% 26.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 102% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 55%
WDC WD30 EZRZ-00GXCB0 3TB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 162 162 163 162 157 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	66.4% Good	Read 159 Write 164 Mixed 133 SusWrite 161 211% 154 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 130% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 66%
WDC WD60 EDAZ-11BMZB0 6TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 3.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	56.8% Above average	Read 189 Write 167 Mixed 112 SusWrite 0.1 143% 117 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 9.3 4K Mixed 0.7 352% 4.43 MB/s	DQ Read 0.4 DQ Write 9.6 DQ Mixed 0.6 348% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 70%
WD easystore 2625 5TB 57 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2.5TB free, PID 2625 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 95 94 95 94 95 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	59.8% Above average	Read 117 Write 105 Mixed 82.3 SusWrite 93.9 132% 99.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 7.2 4K Mixed 0.8 276% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 65%
WDC WD20 SPZX-11UA7T0 2TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1.5TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 0 1.4 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	19.5% Very poor	Read 39.6 Write 39.4 Mixed 30.7 SusWrite 0.2 35% 27.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 0.4 166% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 19.5% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GB 4,962 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	102% Outstanding	MC Read 42 MC Write 27.1 MC Mixed 40.2 104% 36.4 GB/s	SC Read 29.8 SC Write 27 SC Mixed 37.5 90% 31.4 GB/s	Latency 66.1 60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 144%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 17,515 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 142%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $140

CPU
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $115Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	5,257x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $189Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	3,456x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $206Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,681x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	1,736x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	1,393x
RTX 3060Nvidia $250Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	1,378x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,124x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	762x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	728x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	710x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	692x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	350x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $906

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16