MSI MEG Z390 GODLIKE (MS-7B10)

Performance Results


Gaming 154% UFO	Desktop 106% UFO	Workstation 152% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	149% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	277% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B10
Motherboard	MSI MEG Z390 GODLIKE (MS-7B10) (all builds)
Memory	58.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191226
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 17 '20 at 18:34
Run Duration	476 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Memory 93.5 1-Core 152 2-Core 307 100% 184 Pts	4-Core 608 8-Core 1,076 102% 842 Pts	64-Core 1,470 91% 1,470 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% MSI(1462 3716) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	149% Outstanding	Lighting 202 Reflection 218 Parallax 235 164% 218 fps	MRender 240 Gravity 210 Splatting 137 154% 196 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 149% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 373GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 960 1234 1538 1591 1581 1562 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	277% Outstanding	Read 2,392 Write 1,816 Mixed 890 SusWrite 1411 363% 1,627 MB/s	4K Read 42.9 4K Write 105 4K Mixed 57.8 195% 68.6 MB/s	DQ Read 867 DQ Write 679 DQ Mixed 773 578% 773 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 277% Great: 353%
Sabrent Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$140 12,308 User benchmarks, average bench 232% 4TB free Firmware: RKT303.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 3718 2613 2583 2565 2480 2524 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	448% Outstanding	Read 4,371 Write 4,247 Mixed 2,190 SusWrite 2,747 759% 3,389 MB/s	4K Read 42 4K Write 130 4K Mixed 62.4 212% 78.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,041 DQ Write 720 DQ Mixed 894 664% 885 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 448% Great: 303%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 578GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 83 84 83 84 81 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	48% Average	Read 85 Write 81 Mixed 85 SusWrite 82 62% 83.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 146% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 67%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$76 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 967GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 110 109 110 110 108 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	57.2% Above average	Read 90 Write 93.7 Mixed 70 SusWrite 109 67% 90.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.9 177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 88%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 123 123 123 124 121 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	75.4% Very good	Read 142 Write 124 Mixed 75.5 SusWrite 121 85% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 528GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 80 81 79 81 78 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	46% Average	Read 80.7 Write 72.3 Mixed 61.2 SusWrite 79 54% 73.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 165% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 83%
Asmedia ASM105x 256GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 128GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 15% Great: 19%
Seagate M3 Portable 4TB 5,513 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 3.5TB free Firmware: 9300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 42 42 41 40 42 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	22.2% Poor	Read 34.8 Write 39.3 Mixed 33 SusWrite 41.2 28% 37.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 0.8 191% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 65%
ASMT 2115 3TB 494 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2.5TB free, PID 1153 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 115 114 114 113 112 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	51.1% Above average	Read 132 Write 127 Mixed 96.2 SusWrite 113 157% 117 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 116% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 72%
WDC WD20 EARX-32PASB0 2TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 2TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0 0.1 0 0.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	9.65% Terrible	Read 37.7 Write 29.2 Mixed 24.8 SusWrite 0.1 28% 22.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 64% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.65% Great: 40%
WDC WD20 EFRX-68EUZN0 2TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 807GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0 0.1 0.1 0.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	13.6% Very poor	Read 39.7 Write 34.3 Mixed 31.5 SusWrite 0.1 33% 26.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.8 115% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 62%
WDC WD20 EFRX-68EUZN0 2TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 2TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 36 37 36 35 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	20.6% Poor	Read 40 Write 39.5 Mixed 34.3 SusWrite 35.9 51% 37.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 112% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 62%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00D8PB0 2TB 77 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 2TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 4.6 4.5 4.7 4.6 4.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	15% Very poor	Read 40.2 Write 37.2 Mixed 34.3 SusWrite 4.6 37% 29.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.8 119% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 59%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00DC0B0 2TB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 35 34 37 34 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	22.2% Poor	Read 40.5 Write 39.5 Mixed 31.2 SusWrite 35.8 50% 36.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.9 125% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 57%
WDC WD20 EARX-00PASB0 2TB 130 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	13.5% Very poor	Read 39 Write 38.5 Mixed 27.8 SusWrite 0.1 33% 26.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.7 112% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 48%
ST2000DM 001-9YN164 2TB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.1 0 0.1 0.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	10.1% Very poor	Read 40 Write 36.5 Mixed 29.3 SusWrite 0.1 33% 26.5 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 75% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.1% Great: 71%
ST2000DM 001-9YN164 2TB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 4.7 4.5 4.4 4.7 4.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	9.83% Terrible	Read 40.3 Write 41.7 Mixed 32 SusWrite 4.5 38% 29.6 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.6 55% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.83% Great: 71%
Mass Storage Device 250GB 1,340 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 72GB free, PID 6116 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	65.2% Good	Read 38.3 Write 41 Mixed 39.7 SusWrite 41.2 55% 40 MB/s	4K Read 11.7 4K Write 15.6 4K Mixed 13.8 1,043% 13.7 MB/s	DQ Read 12.6 DQ Write 15.7 DQ Mixed 14.1 1,060% 14.1 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMK32GX4M2B3000C15 029E CMK16GX4M1B3000C15 029E CMK16GX4M1B3000C15 029E CMK32GX4M2B3000C15 64GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	93% Outstanding	MC Read 31.3 MC Write 37.6 MC Mixed 29.4 94% 32.8 GB/s	SC Read 20.4 SC Write 42 SC Mixed 27.4 86% 29.9 GB/s	Latency 61 66% 61 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 93% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MEG Z390 GODLIKE (MS-7B10) Builds (Compare 1,031 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG Z390 GODLIKE (MS-7B10) - $600

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	778x
Core i9-9900KSIntelBench 99%, 12,840 samples	108x
Core i7-9700KIntel $295Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	42x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	297x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,148Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	97x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	87x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	91x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	80x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	48x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	30x
CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 4x16GBCorsairBench 91%, 18,655 samples	27x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,659

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16