Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 126% UFO	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 118% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	142% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	170% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190307
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 29 '19 at 17:57
Run Duration	245 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$155 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	87.7% Excellent	Memory 90.7 1-Core 126 2-Core 240 86% 152 Pts	4-Core 455 8-Core 782 75% 618 Pts	64-Core 1,051 65% 1,051 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 87.7% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Nvidia(10DE 1E07) ≥ 4GB; NE6208TS20LC-150A, Palit Microsystems Gaming Pro OC CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 431.60 Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	142% Outstanding	Lighting 187 Reflection 208 Parallax 218 152% 205 fps	MRender 246 Gravity 206 Splatting 129 152% 194 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 142% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 512GB 29,096 User benchmarks, average bench 203% 137GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFM12.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 644 447 516 462 458 445 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	170% Outstanding	Read 1,928 Write 1,121 Mixed 637 SusWrite 495 230% 1,045 MB/s	4K Read 39.4 4K Write 109 4K Mixed 54.8 188% 67.7 MB/s	DQ Read 45.1 DQ Write 152 DQ Mixed 65.3 60% 87.4 MB/s
Poor: 112% ↑ This bench: 170% Great: 291%
SanDisk Ultra 3D 500GB-$61 13,482 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 39GB free Firmware: X61110RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 409 410 392 386 400 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	97.5% Outstanding	Read 507 Write 483 Mixed 305 SusWrite 403 95% 424 MB/s	4K Read 37.9 4K Write 96 4K Mixed 40.6 160% 58.2 MB/s	DQ Read 40.8 DQ Write 122 DQ Mixed 54.1 49% 72.3 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 97.5% Great: 119%
Toshiba HG6 256GB 4,588 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 4GB free Firmware: JURA0101 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 495 Write 460 Mixed 452 105% 469 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 72.5 4K Mixed 40.1 129% 46.1 MB/s	DQ Read 30.1 DQ Write 85.9 DQ Mixed 43.9 38% 53.3 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$87 14,331 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 3.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 105 106 118 120 108 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	57.6% Above average	Read 86.2 Write 69.3 Mixed 74.8 SusWrite 113 64% 85.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 0.6 218% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 41GB free Firmware: CC4B SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 126 124 128 130 127 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	80% Very good	Read 152 Write 100 Mixed 85 SusWrite 127 86% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.9 146% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 114%
Toshiba MD04ACA500 5TB-$154 3,810 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 60GB free Firmware: FP1A SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 149 152 191 182 151 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	87.1% Excellent	Read 141 Write 137 Mixed 50.2 SusWrite 162 89% 123 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 238% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 87.1% Great: 110%
BUFFALO External HDD 3TB 61 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 213GB free, PID 027e Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 125 109 119 128 136 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	50.7% Above average	Read 110 Write 117 Mixed 38.5 SusWrite 127 132% 98.3 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 102% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 72%
BUFFALO External HDD 8TB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 1.5TB free, PID 02c1 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 118 119 129 130 127 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	57.2% Above average	Read 95.7 Write 110 Mixed 80 SusWrite 125 142% 103 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 0.6 201% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 72%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB 600 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 103GB free, PID 3322 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 164 166 160 158 161 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	71.3% Very good	Read 162 Write 150 Mixed 85 SusWrite 161 186% 140 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 3.8 4K Mixed 0.7 167% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 71%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 466GB free, PID d001 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 159 163 163 161 162 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	61.5% Good	Read 138 Write 145 Mixed 34.3 SusWrite 161 160% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Patriot 4133 C19 Series 2x8GB 2,074 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3600 MHz clocked @ 1800 MHz Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	129% Outstanding	MC Read 51.2 MC Write 48.4 MC Mixed 43.1 136% 47.6 GB/s	SC Read 30.2 SC Write 41.9 SC Mixed 36.1 103% 36.1 GB/s	Latency 66.2 60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 129% Great: 151%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,858 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 80%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,437x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	306x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	281x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	234x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	232x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	202x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	189x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	188x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	177x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	202x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	142x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	134x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $1,013

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)