Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE L755 (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel Base Board Product Name
Memory	4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120626
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 25 '21 at 10:42
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200 51,169 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	39.9% Below average	Memory 62.3 1-Core 18.9 2-Core 55.2 31% 45.5 Pts	4-Core 96.4 8-Core 181 16% 139 Pts	64-Core 298 18% 298 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 525M 9,032 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Toshiba(1179 FC50) 1GB CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.54 Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	2.3% Terrible	Lighting 2.7 Reflection 4.3 Parallax 1.5 2% 2.83 fps	MRender 4.3 Gravity 3 Splatting 2.2 2% 3.17 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.3% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V+200 Series 90GB 681 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 50GB free (System drive) Firmware: 332ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 69 74 74 77 76 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	28.3% Poor	Read 149 Write 87.5 Mixed 109 SusWrite 73.9 23% 105 MB/s	4K Read 9.1 4K Write 25.4 4K Mixed 11.1 42% 15.2 MB/s	DQ Read 138 DQ Write 93.6 DQ Mixed 112 84% 114 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 55%
Generic- SD/MMC 125GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 46GB free, PID 0109 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 11 13 13 13 13 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	15% Very poor	Read 18.7 Write 12.3 Mixed 14.5 SusWrite 12.3 19% 14.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 3.3 223% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 M471B5273CH0-CH9 6GB 924 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	41% Average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 16.8 MC Mixed 15 44% 15.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.1 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 5.2 22% 7.7 GB/s	Latency 121 33% 121 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 525MNvidiaBench 2%, 9,032 samples	262x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	112x
GeForce GT 520MNvidiaBench 2%, 5,654 samples	54x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 13,596 samples	45x
M471B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 37%, 7,983 samples	40x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	25x

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $188

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16