Asus Rampage II Extreme

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	8.29% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	46.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus Rampage II Extreme (all builds)
Memory	16.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110919
Uptime	4.9 Days
Run Date	Jul 29 '21 at 23:37
Run Duration	309 Seconds
Run User	SAU-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 940-$150 2,107 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	66.8% Good	Memory 89.7 1-Core 72.1 2-Core 136 62% 99.1 Pts	4-Core 239 8-Core 371 38% 305 Pts	64-Core 367 23% 367 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740 30,433 User benchmarks, average bench 7% EVGA(3842 3748) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1084 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.41 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	8.29% Terrible	Lighting 9.2 Reflection 11.5 Parallax 12.8 8% 11.2 fps	MRender 13.6 Gravity 12.2 Splatting 10.8 10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.29% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 148 152 160 160 160 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	46.2% Average	Read 228 Write 173 Mixed 155 SusWrite 155 40% 178 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 38.5 4K Mixed 23.7 82% 27.5 MB/s	DQ Read 24 DQ Write 79.3 DQ Mixed 34.5 31% 45.9 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 133%
Crucial M4 256GB-$218 17,938 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 6GB free Firmware: 070H Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 165 Write 127 Mixed 130 31% 140 MB/s	4K Read 15.1 4K Write 32.4 4K Mixed 12.5 56% 20 MB/s	DQ Read 18.8 DQ Write 49.8 DQ Mixed 14.1 16% 27.6 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 74%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB 28,352 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 73GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 50 50 52 51 51 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	26.7% Poor	Read 42.7 Write 41 Mixed 35.3 SusWrite 50 31% 42.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 124% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 51%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 97GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 50 50 52 51 51 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	35.7% Below average	Read 73.9 Write 72.8 Mixed 47.8 SusWrite 50 45% 61.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 67%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18 39,749 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 4GB free Firmware: 03.01A03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 53 58 58 54 60 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	34.1% Below average	Read 61.9 Write 51.6 Mixed 44.2 SusWrite 56.8 40% 53.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 47%
WD My Book 1130 2TB 1,666 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 125GB free, PID 1130 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 20 21 20 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	15.3% Very poor	Read 32 Write 23.2 Mixed 24.7 SusWrite 20.1 33% 25 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.5 86% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 48%
WD My Book 1130 1TB 1,203 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 56GB free, PID 1130 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 20 20 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	12.1% Very poor	Read 32 Write 24.8 Mixed 21.4 SusWrite 19.6 32% 24.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 56% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 41%
Toshiba External USB HDD 640GB 87 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 50GB free, PID a001 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 20 20 21 21 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	9.75% Terrible	Read 27.6 Write 26 Mixed 17.4 SusWrite 20.2 30% 22.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.2 22% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.75% Great: 20%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB 600 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 131GB free, PID 3322 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 77 82 84 84 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	33.3% Below average	Read 81.9 Write 58.2 Mixed 48.1 SusWrite 79.2 88% 66.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 74% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 71%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 200GB free, PID 10a8 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 21 21 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	10% Very poor	Read 29.9 Write 24.7 Mixed 16 SusWrite 19.8 29% 22.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.5 33% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 10% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x8GB 41,916 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 6 slots used 32GB DIMM Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	35% Below average	MC Read 12.4 MC Write 11.4 MC Mixed 10.7 33% 11.5 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 10.7 28% 9.77 GB/s	Latency 67.7 59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	32"	1280 720	DON003D DENON-AVR

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Rampage II Extreme Builds (Compare 527 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus Rampage II Extreme

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	176x
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	46x
Core i7 975Intel $550Bench 72%, 3,143 samples	46x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	30x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	30x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	30x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	14x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	13x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	109x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	83x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	46x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $296

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16