Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7

Performance Results


Gaming 106% UFO	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 98% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	193% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7 (all builds)
Memory	24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180301
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 13 '21 at 16:25
Run Duration	357 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	89.8% Excellent	Memory 87.3 1-Core 129 2-Core 263 88% 160 Pts	4-Core 496 8-Core 819 80% 657 Pts	64-Core 1,060 66% 1,060 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 89.8% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85F1) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 471.96 Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	117% Outstanding	Lighting 157 Reflection 174 Parallax 163 128% 165 fps	MRender 124 Gravity 164 Splatting 117 109% 135 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 203 201 201 197 196 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	193% Outstanding	Read 1,880 Write 1,200 Mixed 449 SusWrite 241 207% 943 MB/s	4K Read 39 4K Write 129 4K Mixed 51.8 194% 73.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,092 DQ Write 875 DQ Mixed 617 562% 861 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 193% Great: 236%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 417GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 318 316 314 319 322 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	84.4% Excellent	Read 344 Write 322 Mixed 304 SusWrite 316 72% 322 MB/s	4K Read 34 4K Write 53.9 4K Mixed 40.4 132% 42.8 MB/s	DQ Read 248 DQ Write 208 DQ Mixed 224 169% 227 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 205GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 460 458 455 462 466 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	123% Outstanding	Read 478 Write 468 Mixed 386 SusWrite 458 101% 447 MB/s	4K Read 42 4K Write 103 4K Mixed 56.8 191% 67.3 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 345 DQ Mixed 361 272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 216GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 302 301 302 302 302 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 477 Write 468 Mixed 392 SusWrite 319 93% 414 MB/s	4K Read 40.3 4K Write 103 4K Mixed 53.6 184% 65.7 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 343 DQ Mixed 359 270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 797GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 465 459 456 451 459 463 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	122% Outstanding	Read 479 Write 450 Mixed 396 SusWrite 459 100% 446 MB/s	4K Read 41.9 4K Write 105 4K Mixed 55.2 190% 67.3 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 340 DQ Mixed 359 270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 122% Great: 133%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$61 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 1.5TB free Firmware: 81.00A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 135 137 138 138 139 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	75.4% Very good	Read 127 Write 125 Mixed 87.2 SusWrite 136 87% 119 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 181% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 029E CMU16GX4M2C3200C16 029E CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 029E CMU16GX4M2C3200C16 32GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	69.4% Good	MC Read 24.7 MC Write 26.6 MC Mixed 21.6 69% 24.3 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 26.9 SC Mixed 22.4 62% 21.7 GB/s	Latency 70.2 57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 38: 4R 4G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
38%	33%	42	108	6	165	27"	2560 1440	ACI27EC ROG PG279Q

History: Score 29: 3R 4G 2B | Score 38: 4R 4G 6B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 3,970 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 112%

UFO

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7 - $221

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	2,886x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	211x
Core i7-8086KIntel $399Bench 91%, 38,086 samples	182x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	755x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	359x
RTX 3080Nvidia $600Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	295x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	210x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	169x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $67Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	158x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	186x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	173x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	128x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $1,049

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16