Gigabyte X570 AORUS PRO WIFI

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	24.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	265% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte X570 AORUS PRO WIFI (all builds)
Memory	42.7 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20211001
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 16 '21 at 13:27
Run Duration	274 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	20%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	83.4% Excellent	Memory 75.2 1-Core 115 2-Core 257 80% 149 Pts	4-Core 492 8-Core 794 79% 643 Pts	64-Core 1,284 80% 1,284 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 83.4% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% EVGA(3842 6264) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2176 MHz, MLim: 2168 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.41 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	24.5% Poor	Lighting 30 Reflection 30 Parallax 30 24% 30 fps	MRender 30 Gravity 30 Splatting 30 25% 30 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$80 58,572 User benchmarks, average bench 341% 266GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1190 958 929 900 879 848 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	265% Outstanding	Read 2,474 Write 2,652 Mixed 1,075 SusWrite 951 399% 1,788 MB/s	4K Read 50.3 4K Write 156 4K Mixed 64.5 242% 90.4 MB/s	DQ Read 872 DQ Write 660 DQ Mixed 781 580% 771 MB/s
Poor: 206% ↑ This bench: 265% Great: 442%
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44 34,705 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 223GB free Firmware: 3.ADA SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 101 101 101 101 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	57.4% Above average	Read 99.9 Write 99.7 Mixed 50.5 SusWrite 100 64% 87.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.8 137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 54%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 355GB free Firmware: HP22 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 123 124 124 124 124 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	70.6% Very good	Read 123 Write 83.2 Mixed 70.5 SusWrite 123 73% 99.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1 172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 70%
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44 34,705 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 226GB free Firmware: 4.CCB SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 90 91 91 91 91 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	54.5% Above average	Read 98.9 Write 56 Mixed 47.2 SusWrite 90.9 54% 73.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.9 150% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 54%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB 55 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 1TB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 101 105 102 106 102 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	58.6% Above average	Read 100 Write 33.2 Mixed 63.6 SusWrite 104 56% 75.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 110%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 3TB 4.5TB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 64 64 59 58 64 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	45.8% Average	Read 102 Write 2.7 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 56.6 30% 41.5 MB/s	4K Read 2.7 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.7 201% 1.33 MB/s

Best Buy Geek Squad 4GB 46 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 3GB free, PID 554f Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	9.29% Terrible	Read 31.1 Write 8.7 Mixed 4.5 SusWrite 10.8 15% 13.8 MB/s	4K Read 10.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 38% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 9.29% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GVKB TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 F4-3200C16-8GVKB TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 48GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz 8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	79.4% Very good	MC Read 30.6 MC Write 23.4 MC Mixed 30.7 81% 28.2 GB/s	SC Read 23.6 SC Write 23.3 SC Mixed 31.3 74% 26.1 GB/s	Latency 90 44% 90 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 138%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X570 AORUS PRO WIFI Builds (Compare 2,222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 161%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 162%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS PRO WIFI - $254

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	438x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	336x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $260Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	288x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	215x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	212x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	155x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	131x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	129x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $154Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	88x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	103x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $115Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	48x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	37x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $1,476

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16