HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.67% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive23.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1998
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 17 '21 at 04:49
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 79.3
1-Core 110
2-Core 220
76% 137 Pts
4-Core 407
8-Core 581
62% 494 Pts
64-Core 575
36% 575 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7750
Device(1545 7750) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
7.67% Terrible
Lighting 8.9
Reflection 15.5
Parallax 14.4
7% 12.9 fps
MRender 11.4
Gravity 9.6
Splatting 10.2
8% 10.4 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.67%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
M3 240GB SSD 240GB
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 7 88 8.8 11 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
23.5% Poor
Read 415
Write 352
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 56.8
46% 209 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 8
4K Mixed 0.3
13% 4.53 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 80%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
384GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2138 701 618 620 626 626 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
247% Outstanding
Read 2,067
Write 1,876
Mixed 1,381
SusWrite 888
348% 1,553 MB/s
4K Read 56.9
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 75.1
250% 86.9 MB/s
DQ Read 906
DQ Write 536
DQ Mixed 759
555% 734 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 247%
Great: 340%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 16GB
0GB free, PID a81d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 11 13 10 13 13 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
7.4% Terrible
Read 25
Write 5.7
Mixed 13.7
SusWrite 10.7
16% 13.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.4%
Great: 9%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB
14GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 5 7.1 9.2 8.5 4.1 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
4.55% Terrible
Read 14.7
Write 5.5
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 6.2
9% 7.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.55%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
55.3% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 16.1
54% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 20.8
SC Mixed 17.9
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 81.9
49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 6,333 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback