Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics78.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive42.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120917
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 19 '22 at 12:02
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 51%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6100-$68
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
52.6% Above average
Memory 77.2
1-Core 65.9
2-Core 114
54% 85.7 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 238
24% 196 Pts
64-Core 235
15% 235 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.3% Very good
Lighting 95.8
Reflection 107
Parallax 97.9
78% 100 fps
MRender 94.4
Gravity 97.2
Splatting 96.5
79% 96 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 480GB (2018)-$69
234GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG430400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 165 32 34 75 32 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 391
Write 349
Mixed 183
SusWrite 100
57% 256 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 31.4
4K Mixed 10.8
61% 20.7 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 15.6
DQ Mixed 20.6
26% 47.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 60%
Plextor PX-256M5S 256GB
156GB free
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 319 359 363 352 359 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 353
Write 291
Mixed 238
SusWrite 342
69% 306 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 47.6
4K Mixed 28.8
96% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 263
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 154
139% 212 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 95%
WD Black 750GB (2008)-$140
309GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 89 91 92 93 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 109
Write 105
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 91.4
68% 92.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 65%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$63
6GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 73 75 57 71 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 73.9
Write 67.7
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 69.3
50% 67 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 57%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
84GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 89 98 107 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 113
Write 101
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 95.5
70% 95.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 67%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
253GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 110 112 112 112 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 118
Write 106
Mixed 105
SusWrite 110
82% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-439.A00LF KHX1866C10D3/4G 9905403-439.A00LF KHX1866C10D3/4G 16GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.8% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 12.8
38% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 9.5
23% 8 GB/s
Latency 85.8
47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,825 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $353
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback