Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 31 '22 at 05:37
Run Duration281 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Memory 67.9
1-Core 160
2-Core 322
95% 183 Pts
4-Core 640
8-Core 985
100% 813 Pts
64-Core 1122
69% 1122 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 8809) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.7.1
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Lighting 21.7
Reflection 20.5
Parallax 29.6
18% 23.9 fps
MRender 13.2
Gravity 23.4
Splatting 21.5
16% 19.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
417GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 414 374 437 435 437 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 478
Write 438
Mixed 375
SusWrite 417
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 78.6
4K Mixed 48.5
169% 56.7 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 198
149% 200 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 106%
Great: 134%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
209GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 276 275 276 276 276 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Read 461
Write 426
Mixed 388
SusWrite 292
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 74.2
4K Mixed 50.1
165% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 156
129% 186 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 118%
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
179GB free
Firmware: 411030WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 219 259 259 258 260 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 294
Mixed 286
SusWrite 250
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 75.4
4K Mixed 44.8
151% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 233
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 197
146% 195 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 111%
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
72GB free
Firmware: 411030WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 277 265 266 264 268 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 486
Write 334
Mixed 231
SusWrite 271
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 73.9
4K Mixed 29.8
132% 46.6 MB/s
DQ Read 233
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 164
134% 191 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 111%
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
459GB free
Firmware: 411030WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 260 257 256 258 257 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Read 430
Write 408
Mixed 333
SusWrite 267
81% 359 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 75.9
4K Mixed 45
151% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 197
149% 202 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 111%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
209GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 85 86 87 87 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 93.9
Write 93.6
Mixed 54.1
SusWrite 85.8
60% 81.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 68%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$70
661GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 65 67 68 67 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 69.4
Write 73
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 66.4
50% 67.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
169% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 63%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
711GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 105 105 107 107 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 112
Write 110
Mixed 57.1
SusWrite 105
70% 96.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
133% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 67%
USB DISK 2.0 8GB
7GB free, PID 1621
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 5.7 7.2 6.8 2.4 2.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.75% Terrible
Read 15.7
Write 3.7
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 4.4
6% 6.38 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.75%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3200 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
87.7% Excellent
MC Read 33.9
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 29.8
91% 31.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 33.8
SC Mixed 26.1
79% 27.5 GB/s
Latency 107
38% 107 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,892 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,012
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback