Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 100% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 91% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	215% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170831
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 20 '17 at 17:20
Run Duration	210 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	55%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$208 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	94.9% Outstanding	Memory 93 1-Core 143 2-Core 276 95% 171 Pts	4-Core 520 8-Core 813 82% 667 Pts	64-Core 1,057 65% 1,057 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 94.9% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$245 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Asus(1043 8592) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (61^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	103% Outstanding	Lighting 134 Reflection 146 Parallax 120 109% 133 fps	MRender 114 Gravity 129 Splatting 106 94% 116 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO 500GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 494GB free Firmware: M0CR011 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 2 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1526 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 670 (AB) Unknown 100 100 1 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 14 (AE) Unknown 100 100 113 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 75 43 244813922329 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 99 99 1 (CE) Flying height 100 100 1 (F6) Unknown 100 100 13905801588 (F7) Unknown 100 100 434738232 (F8) Unknown 100 100 111378505 (B4) Unknown 0 0 3524 (D2) Unknown 100 100 4	96.9% Outstanding	Read 494 Write 402 Mixed 402 96% 433 MB/s	4K Read 28.5 4K Write 100 4K Mixed 27.8 132% 52.3 MB/s	DQ Read 337 DQ Write 257 DQ Mixed 48.9 104% 214 MB/s
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 96.9% Great: 97%
Samsung MZ7LN256HCHP-00000 256GB 1,578 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 133GB free Firmware: EMT0100Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5241 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1068 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 98 98 23 (AE) Unknown 99 99 12 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 707 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 70 59 30 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 98 98 16584277 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2873 (F2) Unknown 99 99 2629 (F9) Unknown 99 99 5888	105% Outstanding	Read 519 Write 295 Mixed 368 87% 394 MB/s	4K Read 37.3 4K Write 127 4K Mixed 37.6 172% 67.3 MB/s	DQ Read 349 DQ Write 296 DQ Mixed 109 140% 252 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 105%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	215% Outstanding	Read 2,016 Write 960 Mixed 1,074 296% 1,350 MB/s	4K Read 55.6 4K Write 140 4K Mixed 27 193% 74.2 MB/s	DQ Read 513 DQ Write 411 DQ Mixed 183 213% 369 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 215% Great: 236%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 43GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 10201 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 690 (B1) Unknown 99 99 9 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 53 26 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 63 (F1) Unknown 99 99 11011256851	102% Outstanding	Read 515 Write 413 Mixed 419 100% 449 MB/s	4K Read 48.2 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 29.1 166% 61.1 MB/s	DQ Read 46.6 DQ Write 271 DQ Mixed 116 102% 144 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 134%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB 10,357 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 3.5TB free Firmware: D781 Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	71.8% Very good	Read 139 Write 109 Mixed 96.7 86% 115 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 5.68 4K Mixed 0.54 344% 3.51 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114 34,353 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2.5TB free Firmware: 0001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 81 64 138490758 (03) Spinup time 94 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1475 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 78 60 59822984 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 -100772817660584 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 567 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 57 538378272 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 829 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 86 86 29649 (C2) HDA temperature 32 43 55834574880 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 75844827483493 (F1) Unknown 100 253 12854602013 (F2) Unknown 100 253 7878981407	82.4% Excellent	Read 135 Write 152 Mixed 134 106% 140 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.97 4K Mixed 0.16 83% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GB-$42 66,222 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	75.2% Very good	MC Read 27.7 MC Write 27.5 MC Mixed 23.6 75% 26.3 GB/s	SC Read 17.8 SC Write 28.9 SC Mixed 23.5 67% 23.4 GB/s	Latency 62.1 64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 7,496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 111%

UFO

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING - $477

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $208Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	4,780x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	1,051x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	481x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	1,360x
GTX 1080Nvidia $245Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	812x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	399x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	346x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	295x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	282x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	406x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	331x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	265x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $1,268

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16