bin bin

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	27.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	7.81GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 7.81GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Microsoft Virtual Machine
Memory	4.8 GB free of 7.8125 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191101
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 26 '23 at 08:18
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	57%

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350 Eight-Core 12 User benchmarks, average bench 57% None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 3 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	44.1% Average	Memory 69.6 1-Core 61.1 2-Core 79.6 46% 70.1 Pts	4-Core 108 8-Core 125 15% 116 Pts	64-Core 110 7% 110 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 370 Device(0000 0000) Driver: Ver. 10.0.19041.1 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	27.3% Poor	Lighting 24.2 Reflection 35.5 Parallax 32.7 20% 30.8 fps	MRender 59.7 Gravity 47.1 Splatting 48.9 42% 51.9 fps

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 537GB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 470GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 141 177 131 172 191 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.3% Poor	Read 209 Write 165 Mixed 159 SusWrite 157 39% 172 MB/s	4K Read 8.2 4K Write 12.5 4K Mixed 6.5 27% 9.07 MB/s	DQ Read 22.4 DQ Write 72.2 DQ Mixed 20.9 24% 38.5 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None 7GB 176 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 0, 0 MHz 3072, 4928 MB Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	35.5% Below average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 11 MC Mixed 13 36% 12.6 GB/s	SC Read 7.8 SC Write 7.3 SC Mixed 10.5 24% 8.53 GB/s	Latency 98.1 41% 98.1 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	43	23	64	0"	1280 720	HyperVMonitor

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,278 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2,024x
Core i7-2600Intel $190Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1,569x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	933x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,142x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,040x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	822x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	457x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	425x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	517x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	376x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	297x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16