Asus PRIME X299-DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics56.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X299-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170906
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 03 '18 at 06:55
Run Duration246 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7900X-$393
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Memory 77.6
1-Core 132
2-Core 260
85% 157 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 920
86% 716 Pts
64-Core 1,781
110% 1,781 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.71
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Lighting 69
Reflection 67.5
Parallax 58.9
56% 65.2 fps
MRender 71.8
Gravity 65.2
Splatting 68.2
56% 68.4 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190
337GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 517
Write 496
Mixed 508
113% 507 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 89.4
4K Mixed 40
147% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 17.3
99% 228 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 111%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
328GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Read 514
Write 411
Mixed 422
100% 449 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 77.9
4K Mixed 20
123% 45 MB/s
DQ Read 30.1
DQ Write 40.4
DQ Mixed 134
74% 68.1 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
289GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 521
Write 411
Mixed 412
100% 448 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 78.1
4K Mixed 17.4
122% 44.7 MB/s
DQ Read 28
DQ Write 38.4
DQ Mixed 13.7
16% 26.7 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
675GB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 146
Write 134
Mixed 116
99% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.61
4K Mixed 0.19
74% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 113%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB
3.5TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 125
Write 128
Mixed 131
166% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.81
4K Write 1.89
4K Mixed 0.52
85% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 98%
MUSHKIN MKNUFDVP32GB 32GB
29GB free, PID 5200, Mushkin Ventura Pro 32GB
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 35.3
Write 18.1
Mixed 17.6
27% 23.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.87
4K Write 0.45
4K Mixed 0.33
45% 1.88 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
90% Outstanding
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 48.6
MC Mixed 28.2
102% 35.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 9.9
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 85.2
47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 90%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X299-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,068 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X299-DELUXE - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $1,259
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback