Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive230% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10  (all builds)
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170331
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 29 '18 at 07:42
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$504
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Memory 96.9
1-Core 124
2-Core 227
86% 149 Pts
4-Core 473
8-Core 929
83% 701 Pts
64-Core 1,120
69% 1,120 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.35
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 93% Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$175
633GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 77% Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
575GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 510
Write 350
Mixed 359
90% 406 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 54.3
4K Mixed 24.6
123% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 22.1
57% 125 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 126%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
393GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Read 522
Write 414
Mixed 425
101% 454 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 66.1
4K Mixed 29.7
132% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 267
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 84.4
94% 164 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 133%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
280GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
230% Outstanding
Read 2,281
Write 1,377
Mixed 1,466
377% 1,708 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 30.3
161% 58.6 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 76.5
82% 138 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 230%
Great: 283%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
102GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 517
Write 415
Mixed 419
100% 450 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 68.5
4K Mixed 39.1
149% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 88.2
99% 172 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 101%
Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
89GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Read 522
Write 368
Mixed 414
96% 435 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 77.4
4K Mixed 20.5
117% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 257
DQ Write 84.4
DQ Mixed 62.9
75% 135 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Avexir DDR4-3000 CL15 4GB 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 3000 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
139% Outstanding
MC Read 60.5
MC Write 45.5
MC Mixed 57.2
155% 54.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 24.7
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 50.5
79% 50.5 ns
Poor: 115%
This bench: 139%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 Builds (Compare 1,061 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 - $485

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $1,475
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback