Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics20.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory7.6 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 15 '18 at 04:41
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 82%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$47
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 80.2
1-Core 55.4
2-Core 120
53% 85.1 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 304
34% 267 Pts
64-Core 294
18% 294 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
EVGA(3842 3759) 2GB
CLim: 1450 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
20.5% Poor
Lighting 26.1
Reflection 19.1
Parallax 22.5
21% 22.6 fps
MRender 27.7
Gravity 25.2
Splatting 19
19% 24 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 74 76 79 80 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Read 457
Write 423
Mixed 302
SusWrite 118
72% 325 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 73.9
4K Mixed 46.3
151% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 256
188% 245 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 114%
Intel SSDSA2BT040G3 40GB
17GB free
Firmware: 4PC10362
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 49 49 49 49 49 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
34.7% Below average
Read 194
Write 49.2
Mixed 71.8
SusWrite 48.7
20% 90.9 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 35.5
4K Mixed 16
68% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 37.6
DQ Mixed 54
46% 68.4 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 36%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
576GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 85 85 86 86 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 99.8
Write 102
Mixed 59.8
SusWrite 85.5
64% 86.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
180% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 10GB
1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.9% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 10.8
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 9.9
26% 9 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback