Today's hottest deals
CrucialCT250MX200SSD1
$134
CrucialCT256M4SSD2
$218
 $134 

Controller: Marvell 88SS9189. Flash Memory: Micron 16nm MLC. Release date: Q1 2015.

 $218 

Controller: Marvell 88SS9174-BLD2. Flash Memory: Micron Synchronous 25nm MLC. Release date: Q2 2011.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 44,302 user samples
26,364 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 113% 110GB free
Worst Bench: 69% 211GB free
Poor: 69% Great: 113%
SPEED RANK: 288th / 1080
17,938 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 74% 168GB free
Worst Bench: 43% 72GB free (System drive)
Poor: 43% Great: 74%
SPEED RANK: 804th / 1080
Effective Speed
Effective SSD Speed
94.8 % Much faster effective speed.
+56%
60.8 %
Read
Avg. Sequential Read Speed
426 MB/s 432 MB/s +1%
Write
Avg. Sequential Write Speed
411 MB/s Much faster write speed.
+71%
240 MB/s
4K Read
Avg. 4K Random Read Speed
28 MB/s Much faster random read.
+41%
19.9 MB/s
4K Write
Avg. 4K Random Write Speed
86.7 MB/s Faster random write.
+17%
74.1 MB/s
Mixed
Avg. Sequential Mixed IO Speed
342 MB/s Much faster mixed IO speed.
+37%
250 MB/s
4K Mixed
Avg. 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
39.3 MB/s Hugely faster random mixed IO.
+169%
14.6 MB/s
SusWrite
Avg. Sustained Write Speed
346 MB/s Much faster sustained write speed.
+77%
195 MB/s
Read
Peak Sequential Read Speed
470 MB/s 494 MB/s Slightly faster peak read speed.
+5%
Write
Peak Sequential Write Speed
470 MB/s Much faster peak write speed.
+75%
268 MB/s
4K Read
Peak 4K Random Read Speed
32.6 MB/s Much faster peak random read.
+39%
23.4 MB/s
4K Write
Peak 4K Random Write Speed
120 MB/s Faster peak random write.
+13%
106 MB/s
Mixed
Peak Sequential Mixed IO Speed
382 MB/s Much faster peak mixed IO speed.
+40%
273 MB/s
4K Mixed
Peak 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
47.7 MB/s Hugely faster peak random mixed IO.
+152%
18.9 MB/s
SusWrite
Peak Sequential Sustained Write 60s Average
458 MB/s Much faster peak sustained write speed.
+73%
265 MB/s
Market Share
Based on 77,536,940 SSDs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.02 % 0.02 %
Value
Value For Money
9.84 % Hugely better value.
+121%
4.46 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
55 % Slightly more popular.
+6%
52 %
Price
Price (score)
$134 Much cheaper.
+39%
$218
Age
Newest
118 Months More recent.
+28%
163 Months
DQ Read
Peak 4K-64Thread Read Speed
378 MB/s Hugely faster peak deep queue read.
+105%
184 MB/s
DQ Write
Peak 4K-64Thread Write Speed
364 MB/s Much faster peak deep queue write.
+56%
234 MB/s
AS-SSD Total
AS-SSD Total Score
1,234 Pts Much stronger server IO.
+64%
752 Pts
DQ Mixed
Peak 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
258 MB/s Hugely faster peak deep queue mixed IO.
+679%
33.1 MB/s
ADQ Read
Avg. 4K-64Thread Read Speed
323 MB/s Hugely faster deep queue read.
+143%
133 MB/s
ADQ Write
Avg. 4K-64Thread Write Speed
297 MB/s Hugely faster deep queue write.
+118%
136 MB/s
ADQ Mixed
Avg. 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
222 MB/s Hugely faster deep queue mixed IO.
+837%
23.7 MB/s
Capacity
Capacity
250GB 256GB

The 250GB Crucial MX200 is successor to the hugely successful MX100. Both drives use the same NAND and controller but the new MX200 features Dynamic Write Acceleration (DWA) which is a new dynamically sized SLC cache. Samsung were the first to introduce SLC caching on the 840 Evo nearly two years ago so Crucial are somewhat late to the party. SLC caches generally only help performance in corner case real word scenarios and benchmarks. I prefer drives without SLC caches because they offer more consistent and sustainable real world IO. Comparing the MX100 and MX200 shows that the newer MX200 has a significantly faster peak write speed which is of course explained by the new DWA cache. Price is the deciding factor between the MX100 and MX200 so although the MX200 isn't priced aggressively yet, it will almost certainly move up the value rankings when retailers build stocks and subsequently cut prices. [Feb '15 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

The Crucial M4 is one of the oldest SSD's to have made it into the group test. When it was released its primary competitors were Sandforce based drives which suffered from two major problems: reliability and weak incompressible data performance. As a result this drive was one of the top drives of its time. That was back in Apr '11. Today the M4 is no longer able to compete and scores below average (377.9 MB/s) on the Real World Speed Index benchmark and way below average (676) on the deep queue depth orientated AS-SSD Total score benchmark. Of course these figures are still far faster than any mechanical hard drive and owners of this drive should feel in no hurry to upgrade. People looking to make a new purchase will find much better value elsewhere. [Apr '13 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

Solid State Drive Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 SSD Rankings

Welcome to our SSD comparison. We calculate effective speed for both SATA and NVMe drives based on real world performance then adjust by current prices per GB to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top SSDs. [SSDrivePro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your SSD? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback