Performance Results


Gaming 134% UFO	Desktop 104% UFO	Workstation 126% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	225% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING (all builds)
Memory	58.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180518
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Aug 02 '18 at 04:52
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$193 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Memory 90 1-Core 159 2-Core 316 102% 188 Pts	4-Core 629 8-Core 1,002 100% 816 Pts	64-Core 1,287 80% 1,287 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6593) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.11 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	130% Outstanding	Lighting 182 Reflection 202 Parallax 195 148% 193 fps	MRender 128 Gravity 177 Splatting 123 115% 143 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 130% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Thnsn51t02du7 NVMe TOSHIBA 1024GB 768 User benchmarks, average bench 174% 734GB free (System drive) Firmware: 57DA4103 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 835 780 837 867 983 896 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	225% Outstanding	Read 1,533 Write 1,238 Mixed 917 SusWrite 866 255% 1,139 MB/s	4K Read 45.3 4K Write 140 4K Mixed 65.5 227% 83.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1007 DQ Write 804 DQ Mixed 679 570% 830 MB/s
Poor: 96% ↑ This bench: 225% Great: 247%
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$226 35,454 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 300GB free Firmware: X41200RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 234 284 270 275 232 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	98.5% Outstanding	Read 504 Write 365 Mixed 270 SusWrite 268 78% 352 MB/s	4K Read 26.8 4K Write 114 4K Mixed 40.3 153% 60.4 MB/s	DQ Read 390 DQ Write 290 DQ Mixed 238 206% 306 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 98.5% Great: 107%
WD Red 8TB (2017)-$231 4,534 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 14.5TB free Firmware: 83.H0A83 SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 339 379 365 366 370 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 56% Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 373 377 342 347 385 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 60% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS16G4D240FSC.16FBR BLS16G4D240FSC.16FAD BLS16G4D240FSC.16FBR BLS16G4D240FSC.16FAD 64GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	79% Very good	MC Read 28 MC Write 30.1 MC Mixed 24.7 79% 27.6 GB/s	SC Read 19.2 SC Write 33.1 SC Mixed 25.2 74% 25.8 GB/s	Latency 67.2 60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 87%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 111%

UFO

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	538x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	501x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	429x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	563x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	511x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	473x

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $986

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16