Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive371% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.5 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180411
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 22 '18 at 06:29
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$135
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Memory 92.9
1-Core 140
2-Core 279
94% 171 Pts
4-Core 513
8-Core 807
81% 660 Pts
64-Core 1,154
71% 1,154 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
MSI(1462 360A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 399.24
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 19.9
Reflection 23
Parallax 18.7
16% 20.5 fps
MRender 28.5
Gravity 19.9
Splatting 26
20% 24.8 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
383GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2198 2194 2203 2166 2156 2142 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
371% Outstanding
Read 2,636
Write 2,198
Mixed 1,314
SusWrite 2,177
466% 2,081 MB/s
4K Read 57.7
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 79.7
274% 98.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,154
DQ Write 1,018
DQ Mixed 1,077
810% 1,083 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 371%
Great: 393%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
14GB free
Firmware: 1B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 474
Write 444
Mixed 384
97% 434 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 90.8
4K Mixed 54.6
183% 62.8 MB/s
DQ Read 285
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 242
183% 247 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Toshiba KSG60ZSE 512GB
340GB free
Firmware: 4102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 446 447 447 446 447 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
Read 387
Write 480
Mixed 327
SusWrite 446
93% 410 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 90.3
4K Mixed 42
148% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 218
DQ Mixed 206
165% 233 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 99%
LSI Logical Volume 12TB
7TB free
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 38 39 39 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 10% Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2460 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
81.9% Excellent
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 24.8
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 34.1
SC Mixed 26
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 62.4
64% 62.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $610
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback