Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-G1.Sniper 3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive26% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-G1.Sniper 3  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130220
Uptime10.1 Days
Run DateOct 19 '18 at 16:25
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 101
2-Core 195
75% 129 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 486
50% 400 Pts
64-Core 492
30% 492 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 16 45 21 67 50 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26% Poor
Read 196
Write 90.8
Mixed 91
SusWrite 52
24% 108 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 20.5
4K Mixed 11.2
47% 15.4 MB/s
DQ Read 16.6
DQ Write 17.5
DQ Mixed 16.4
12% 16.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 26%
Great: 85%
Rdm-ii XM020C 24GB
5GB free
Firmware: C3M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 28 27 27 28 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 210
Write 29.8
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 27.8
17% 80.4 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 28.4
4K Mixed 23.1
87% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 56.8
DQ Write 29.2
DQ Mixed 38.9
30% 41.6 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 39%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
217GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 107 103 108 104 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 101
Write 108
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 105
71% 96 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
200% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391B1G73BH0-CK0 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50% Above average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 15.4
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-G1.Sniper 3 Builds (Compare 106 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G1.Sniper 3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $245
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $382
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback