Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics61.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive33.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 30 '18 at 16:46
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$160
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
57.9% Above average
Memory 94.4
1-Core 127
2-Core 125
74% 115 Pts
4-Core 128
8-Core 131
17% 130 Pts
64-Core 135
8% 135 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
61.8% Good
Lighting 58.9
Reflection 51.1
Parallax 117
48% 75.7 fps
MRender 97.2
Gravity 122
Splatting 105
88% 108 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Galax TA1D0120A 120GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM11.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 65 39 55 28 31 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.3% Below average
Read 258
Write 203
Mixed 198
SusWrite 46.8
39% 176 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 11.2
4K Mixed 12.1
58% 15.9 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 12.8
DQ Mixed 22.6
27% 49.9 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 80%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
52GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,318
Write 1,466
Mixed 644
254% 1,143 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 55.6
195% 73 MB/s
DQ Read 1,078
DQ Write 1,045
DQ Mixed 879
710% 1,001 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
ST2000DM006-2DM164 240GB
102GB free
Firmware: SAFM12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 178 91 84 92 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 451
Write 372
Mixed 322
SusWrite 132
71% 319 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 84.8
4K Mixed 36.9
138% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 178
177% 282 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 83%
Crucial MX300 275GB-$40
253GB free
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 244 394 265 414 405 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Read 422
Write 365
Mixed 344
SusWrite 330
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 88.7
4K Mixed 35.4
130% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 297
218% 281 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
78.6% Very good
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 33.7
MC Mixed 25.8
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 37.4
SC Mixed 26.8
81% 28.2 GB/s
Latency 58.7
68% 58.7 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING Builds (Compare 11,179 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING - $375

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 111% - Outstanding Total price: $902
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback