Today's hottest deals

HP Elite Slice

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Elite Slice  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81C3
Memory15.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180717
Uptime4 Days
Run DateJan 15 '19 at 02:08
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 77.8
1-Core 78.5
2-Core 149
61% 102 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 458
44% 365 Pts
64-Core 501
31% 501 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
HP(103C 81C3) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4877
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.06% Terrible
Lighting 7.5
Reflection 11
Parallax 7.34
6% 8.6 fps
MRender 10.6
Gravity 6.77
Splatting 14
9% 10.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.06%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLV256HCHP-000H1 256GB
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXV7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 262 246 262 263 264 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 1,086
Write 281
Mixed 307
SusWrite 262
106% 484 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 62.6
4K Mixed 31.6
110% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 391
DQ Write 259
DQ Mixed 332
246% 327 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 108%
Great: 153%
Mushkin Reactor 1TB-$50
128GB free
Firmware: N1007C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 392 399 415 102 413 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Read 465
Write 382
Mixed 292
SusWrite 350
84% 372 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 49.2
4K Mixed 26.2
90% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 198
170% 249 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 105%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
3GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 4.8 6.4 5.8 6 6.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
4.22% Terrible
Read 6.5
Write 2.5
Mixed 6.8
SusWrite 5.5
7% 5.32 MB/s
4K Read 8.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
33% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.22%
Great: 7%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 124GB
96GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 140
Write 96.5
Mixed 100
136% 112 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 2.4
177% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0xF785] J642GU42J5213N1 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.8% Good
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 21.2
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 19.7
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 84.7
47% 84.7 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Elite Slice Builds (Compare 106 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Elite Slice

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback