Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 145%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive282% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190704
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 13 '19 at 23:57
Run Duration317 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$314
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Memory 87.9
1-Core 151
2-Core 301
98% 180 Pts
4-Core 596
8-Core 1,190
105% 893 Pts
64-Core 2,174
134% 2,174 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 174
Reflection 196
Parallax 174
142% 181 fps
MRender 126
Gravity 180
Splatting 128
117% 145 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 127%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$80
231GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1226 1301 804 807 804 812 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
282% Outstanding
Read 2,638
Write 2,442
Mixed 1,880
SusWrite 959
443% 1,980 MB/s
4K Read 62.3
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 83.2
274% 94.3 MB/s
DQ Read 766
DQ Write 716
DQ Mixed 744
558% 742 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 282%
Great: 346%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$80
162GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1574 1122 785 780 786 786 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
276% Outstanding
Read 2,502
Write 1,731
Mixed 1,651
SusWrite 972
382% 1,714 MB/s
4K Read 61.4
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 80.1
263% 89.7 MB/s
DQ Read 783
DQ Write 768
DQ Mixed 768
579% 773 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 276%
Great: 346%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$79
373GB free
Firmware: M3CR010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 428 425 426 428 415 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 393
Mixed 402
SusWrite 423
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 69.9
4K Mixed 38.1
132% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 153
116% 157 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 125%
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$99
392GB free
Firmware: X41310RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 386 303 305 296 295 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
78% Very good
Read 467
Write 424
Mixed 338
SusWrite 335
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 40.5
4K Mixed 29
95% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 193
148% 202 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 78%
Great: 108%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78
2TB free
Firmware: FS2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 153 157 155 156 154 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 156
Write 152
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 155
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.2
316% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 109%
Hitachi HDS723030BLE640 3TB
118GB free
Firmware: MX6OAAB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 91 92 91 91 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 96.3
Write 87.5
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 90.3
53% 73.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
170% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
115% Outstanding
MC Read 45.8
MC Write 41
MC Mixed 42.6
123% 43.1 GB/s
SC Read 26.9
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 37.6
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 115%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $276

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $1,308
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback