Gigabyte GA-AB350N-Gaming WIFI-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics87.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive52.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte AB350N-Gaming WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AB350N-Gaming WIFI-CF  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 23 '19 at 12:12
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
81% Excellent
Memory 79.2
1-Core 112
2-Core 224
77% 139 Pts
4-Core 445
8-Core 699
70% 572 Pts
64-Core 883
55% 883 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 81%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$269
Nvidia(10DE 12FD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
87.4% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 110
Parallax 106
90% 109 fps
MRender 137
Gravity 96.5
Splatting 82.1
83% 105 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 97%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Klevv NEO N600 M.2 120GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0921B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 60 57 57 55 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 442
Write 391
Mixed 362
SusWrite 93.7
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 25.6
4K Mixed 26.8
83% 25.2 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 41.9
DQ Mixed 192
110% 112 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL16-16-16 D4-2400 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 25.9
82% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 23.1
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 25.9
76% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AB350N-Gaming WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 526 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350N-Gaming WIFI-CF - $112

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $595
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback