Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Jet ski	Desktop 104% UFO	Workstation 43% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	295% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190801
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 08 '19 at 11:22
Run Duration	324 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Memory 88.9 1-Core 151 2-Core 303 98% 181 Pts	4-Core 601 8-Core 1,191 106% 896 Pts	64-Core 2,199 136% 2,199 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% MSI(1462 8C97) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 436.15 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	29.6% Poor	Lighting 37 Reflection 27.5 Parallax 33.2 30% 32.6 fps	MRender 36.7 Gravity 34.3 Splatting 33.9 28% 35 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 169GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 748 427 419 423 428 424 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	295% Outstanding	Read 2,661 Write 2,308 Mixed 1,638 SusWrite 478 394% 1,771 MB/s	4K Read 68.5 4K Write 225 4K Mixed 98.4 349% 131 MB/s	DQ Read 1,000 DQ Write 1,325 DQ Mixed 1,157 875% 1,161 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 295% Great: 302%
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 80,540 User benchmarks, average bench 217% 477GB free Firmware: 5L2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1779 921 615 616 616 616 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	314% Outstanding	Read 2,369 Write 1,894 Mixed 1,572 SusWrite 860 374% 1,674 MB/s	4K Read 69.4 4K Write 180 4K Mixed 96.5 324% 115 MB/s	DQ Read 1,510 DQ Write 1443 DQ Mixed 1,451 1,097% 1,468 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 314% Great: 296%
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 80,540 User benchmarks, average bench 217% 477GB free Firmware: EXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1797 909 608 610 608 606 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	323% Outstanding	Read 2,380 Write 1881 Mixed 1,610 SusWrite 856 375% 1,682 MB/s	4K Read 72.2 4K Write 216 4K Mixed 102 355% 130 MB/s	DQ Read 1,518 DQ Write 1,426 DQ Mixed 1,438 1,088% 1,460 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 323% Great: 296%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$20 89,637 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 465GB free Firmware: SC13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 83 84 85 82 82 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	53.7% Above average	Read 104 Write 100 Mixed 57.2 SusWrite 83.5 63% 86.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 60%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 120 122 125 126 124 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	60.6% Good	Read 88.5 Write 115 Mixed 62.5 SusWrite 121 71% 96.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 0.6 213% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 90%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 316GB free Firmware: 1AJ100E4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 104 107 113 107 108 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	61.3% Good	Read 105 Write 83.7 Mixed 66 SusWrite 108 67% 90.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 75%
SanDisk Ultra 123GB 2,795 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 111GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 43 36 38 34 37 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	40.3% Average	Read 168 Write 75.2 Mixed 74.3 SusWrite 43.9 106% 90.5 MB/s	4K Read 5.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1.5 127% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4-3600C16-8GTZR F4-3600C16-8GTZR F4-3600C17-8GTZR F4-3600C17-8GTZR 32GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 126% 3600, 3600, 3600, 3600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	128% Outstanding	MC Read 51 MC Write 45.8 MC Mixed 46.9 137% 47.9 GB/s	SC Read 28.3 SC Write 26.9 SC Mixed 42.3 93% 32.5 GB/s	Latency 68.6 58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 127% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 128%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING Builds (Compare 4,583 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 184%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 201%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $260Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	1,030x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	741x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	562x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	561x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	368x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	339x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	418x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	353x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	227x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	219x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GBCorsair $82Bench 95%, 56,114 samples	127x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	109x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $1,277

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16