Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive35.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190912
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 06 '19 at 10:35
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Memory 86.8
1-Core 128
2-Core 257
87% 157 Pts
4-Core 496
8-Core 870
82% 683 Pts
64-Core 1,326
82% 1,326 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 89%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AMD T00 StoreMI 118GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 36 72 43 38 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 318
Write 63.5
Mixed 129
SusWrite 52.9
31% 141 MB/s
4K Read 8.7
4K Write 47
4K Mixed 14.3
56% 23.3 MB/s
DQ Read 103
DQ Write 9.3
DQ Mixed 5.6
17% 39.3 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 198 201 201 201 201 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Read 146
Write 106
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 200
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 113%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
617GB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 38 38 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
22.1% Poor
Read 35.7
Write 35.6
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 37.5
47% 34.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.8
125% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 44.3
MC Write 40.3
MC Mixed 38.5
117% 41 GB/s
SC Read 28
SC Write 43.6
SC Mixed 34.5
101% 35.4 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 114%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $138

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $658
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback