Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 109% UFO	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 125% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	168% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	59.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190801
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 15 '19 at 17:08
Run Duration	245 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	65%

Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	93.3% Outstanding	Memory 80.7 1-Core 141 2-Core 282 91% 168 Pts	4-Core 566 8-Core 1,129 100% 847 Pts	64-Core 2,135 132% 2,135 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 93.3% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$385 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Nvidia(10DE 1E82) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.12 Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	114% Outstanding	Lighting 145 Reflection 161 Parallax 175 118% 160 fps	MRender 183 Gravity 142 Splatting 110 114% 145 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SMI 2263XT 1TB 570 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 284GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0318B0G SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 534 619 259 905 459 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	168% Outstanding	Read 1351 Write 796 Mixed 877 SusWrite 530 198% 888 MB/s	4K Read 43.6 4K Write 144 4K Mixed 25 174% 70.9 MB/s	DQ Read 910 DQ Write 513 DQ Mixed 182 277% 535 MB/s
Poor: 157% ↑ This bench: 168% Great: 319%
Amd-raid NT-1TB 1TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 889GB free Firmware: T180 SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 154 154 163 165 162 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	57.2% Above average	Read 357 Write 260 Mixed 260 SusWrite 157 58% 259 MB/s	4K Read 9.2 4K Write 60.1 4K Mixed 27 80% 32.1 MB/s	DQ Read 109 DQ Write 238 DQ Mixed 148 120% 165 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 63%
Amd-raid Array 4 960GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 871GB free Firmware: 9.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 161 163 175 176 173 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	31.7% Below average	Read 160 Write 316 Mixed 221 SusWrite 167 49% 216 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 44.8 4K Mixed 7.2 38% 18.6 MB/s	DQ Read 42.1 DQ Write 125 DQ Mixed 45.7 46% 70.9 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 79%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 16,705 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 4TB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 153 160 165 165 159 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	81.3% Excellent	Read 124 Write 154 Mixed 33.5 SusWrite 158 85% 117 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 7.1 4K Mixed 0.7 251% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 81.3% Great: 92%
Amd-raid Maxtor 6Y160M0 164GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 152GB free Firmware: YAR5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 56 56 57 57 57 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	26.3% Poor	Read 34.8 Write 57.8 Mixed 32.3 SusWrite 56.3 33% 45.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 26.3% Great: 26%
Amd-raid Array 1 2TB 1,574 User benchmarks, average bench 136% 1.5TB free Firmware: 9.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 158 154 163 162 163 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	84.4% Excellent	Read 136 Write 191 Mixed 88.8 SusWrite 158 105% 143 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 0.7 188% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 212%
Amd-raid Hitachi HDS72101 1TB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 326GB free Firmware: JP4O SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 67 65 72 71 72 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	53.3% Above average	Read 118 Write 65.3 Mixed 30.2 SusWrite 68 51% 70.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 74%
Generic- SD/MMC 253GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 211GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 13 10 15 15 16 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	13.5% Very poor	Read 19 Write 15.8 Mixed 15 SusWrite 13.4 21% 15.8 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 2.6 179% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 14%
Maxtor OneTouch 750GB 332 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 297GB free, PID 7310 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	18% Very poor	Read 37.5 Write 21.2 Mixed 28 SusWrite 39.9 42% 31.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 60% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 19%
NORELSYS 106X 1TB 646 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 388GB free, PID 1066 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 40 40 41 40 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	30.6% Below average	Read 38.7 Write 39.7 Mixed 30.8 SusWrite 40.2 51% 37.3 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 1.5 232% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 3000 2OZ 4x16GB 228 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	MC Read 41.8 MC Write 36.6 MC Mixed 37.9 111% 38.8 GB/s	SC Read 24.9 SC Write 22.3 SC Mixed 35.6 79% 27.6 GB/s	Latency 79.3 50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 162%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,859 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $175

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,309x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $110Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	874x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $189Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	838x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	572x
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	517x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	406x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	343x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	274x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	265x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	242x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	142x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	141x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $1,004

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16