MSI B360 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B22)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics81.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive86.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B22
MotherboardMSI B360 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B22)  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190807
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 23 '19 at 01:14
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100-$68
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 86.7
1-Core 116
2-Core 229
81% 144 Pts
4-Core 428
8-Core 389
56% 408 Pts
64-Core 423
26% 423 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3060 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Lighting 105
Reflection 92.9
Parallax 97.3
86% 98.4 fps
MRender 109
Gravity 89.5
Splatting 77.6
74% 91.9 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
GOODRAM 240GB
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM91.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 214 222 228 249 258 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 394
Write 384
Mixed 315
SusWrite 237
75% 332 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 84.3
4K Mixed 33.2
140% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 193
178% 272 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 102%
Phison SU30 256GB
184GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 190 83 70 77 76 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 380
Write 259
Mixed 295
SusWrite 123
59% 264 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 37.6
4K Mixed 23.7
83% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 141
106% 140 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 55%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$200
719GB free
Firmware: MN6OA5Q0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 105 104 105 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 93.7
Write 104
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 104
66% 89.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
147GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 115 116 113 116 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 120
Write 112
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 115
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 88%
Seagate Expansion 500GB
55GB free
Firmware: 0708
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Read 37.2
Write 41
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 22.1
24% 32.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 62%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075 750GB
89GB free, PID 022b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 42 42 43 43 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 38.5
Write 40.7
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 42.2
49% 36.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 21%
HGST HTS 545050A7E380 500GB
161GB free, PID 0701
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 37
Write 37.5
Mixed 32.3
SusWrite 20.8
42% 31.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
83.9% Excellent
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 27.7
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 33.4
SC Mixed 24.8
72% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B360 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B22) Builds (Compare 4,324 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI B360 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B22) - $108

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $461
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback