Today's hottest deals

MSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics61.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive192% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 27 '19 at 14:24
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$88
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Memory 89.9
1-Core 146
2-Core 294
96% 177 Pts
4-Core 588
8-Core 896
92% 742 Pts
64-Core 1,092
68% 1,092 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$131
CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.11.3
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
61.5% Good
Lighting 78.2
Reflection 73.8
Parallax 96
64% 82.7 fps
MRender 73.8
Gravity 78.2
Splatting 60.9
57% 70.9 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 898 330 331 333 333 330 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
192% Outstanding
Read 1,390
Write 1,013
Mixed 1,104
SusWrite 426
219% 983 MB/s
4K Read 44.5
4K Write 155
4K Mixed 64.1
232% 87.8 MB/s
DQ Read 717
DQ Write 1,023
DQ Mixed 714
584% 818 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 192%
Great: 223%
ESA3SMI2PSTBT120GB 120GB
47GB free
Firmware: Q0518BS
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 268 270 269 271 165 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 501
Write 276
Mixed 324
SusWrite 252
75% 338 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 85.6
4K Mixed 42.2
145% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 156
119% 158 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$34
550GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 164 164 164 163 164 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Read 154
Write 106
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 163
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 113%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$105
333GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 59 60 59 59 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 57.8
Write 59.3
Mixed 45.2
SusWrite 59.1
41% 55.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
94% Outstanding
MC Read 35.7
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 37.3
95% 33.3 GB/s
SC Read 27.6
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 36.3
87% 30.3 GB/s
Latency 67.3
59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 94%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 11,092 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37) - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $930
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback