Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 43% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	55.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	96.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191119
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 27 '20 at 02:56
Run Duration	225 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$155 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	73.5% Very good	Memory 76.8 1-Core 108 2-Core 218 75% 134 Pts	4-Core 378 8-Core 649 62% 513 Pts	64-Core 889 55% 889 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Gigabyte(1458 367A) CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.74 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	55.3% Above average	Lighting 70.2 Reflection 70.1 Parallax 61.9 57% 67.4 fps	MRender 72.5 Gravity 64.6 Splatting 55 52% 64.1 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 172GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 296 303 299 300 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	96.3% Outstanding	Read 488 Write 435 Mixed 432 SusWrite 305 93% 415 MB/s	4K Read 38.9 4K Write 69.3 4K Mixed 47.6 157% 51.9 MB/s	DQ Read 237 DQ Write 177 DQ Mixed 201 152% 205 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 96.3% Great: 128%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB 44,528 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 686GB free Firmware: UH5100RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 99 85 108 94 93 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	44.7% Average	Read 444 Write 260 Mixed 142 SusWrite 100 52% 236 MB/s	4K Read 18.2 4K Write 34.5 4K Mixed 9 57% 20.6 MB/s	DQ Read 115 DQ Write 74.1 DQ Mixed 11.1 31% 66.9 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 58%
WD WD2000JD-00HBB0 196GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 35GB free Firmware: 08.02D08 SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 11 12 12 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	4.95% Terrible	Read 5.5 Write 10 Mixed 1.5 SusWrite 11.7 5% 7.18 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 21% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.95% Great: 32%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 772GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 174 174 172 172 175 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	98.9% Outstanding	Read 174 Write 132 Mixed 77 SusWrite 171 101% 139 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 98.9% Great: 113%
Seagate Backup+ BK 1TB 2,418 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 485GB free Firmware: 0836 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 62.7 45% 62.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 58%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 389GB free Firmware: KC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 124 127 127 129 128 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	66.5% Good	Read 105 Write 104 Mixed 66 SusWrite 127 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.8 137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 88%
Seagate FreeAgent 500GB 796 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 335GB free, PID 3001 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 28 28 28 28 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	14.6% Very poor	Read 26.7 Write 27.5 Mixed 21.5 SusWrite 27.5 35% 25.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1 88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$36 163,634 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	77.4% Very good	MC Read 29.8 MC Write 27.7 MC Mixed 26.4 80% 28 GB/s	SC Read 20.3 SC Write 25.9 SC Mixed 22.4 65% 22.9 GB/s	Latency 86.7 46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,833 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,648x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $170Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,264x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $142Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,415x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,238x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,076x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,469x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,836x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,106x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	867x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	771x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	724x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $934

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16