Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics54.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive233% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z270X-Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming  (all builds)
Memory58.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 30 '20 at 13:46
Run Duration330 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$150
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
77.6% Very good
Memory 87.2
1-Core 115
2-Core 192
77% 131 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 632
60% 499 Pts
64-Core 631
39% 631 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
PwrHis(1787 D580) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.2.2
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Lighting 67
Reflection 69.7
Parallax 85.6
55% 74.1 fps
MRender 71.1
Gravity 68.8
Splatting 57.9
53% 65.9 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXZ7500Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 871 957 1120 1101 966 792 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
233% Outstanding
Read 1,760
Write 1,186
Mixed 500
SusWrite 968
245% 1,104 MB/s
4K Read 48.9
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 61.4
211% 73.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,086
DQ Write 630
DQ Mixed 828
624% 848 MB/s
Poor: 134%
This bench: 233%
Great: 292%
ST16000NM001G-2KK103 16TB
2TB free
Firmware: SN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 191 186 175 170 171 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 192
Write 177
Mixed 97.7
SusWrite 180
36% 162 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 10.9
4K Mixed 1.5
44% 12.2 MB/s
DQ Read 6.2
DQ Write 13.3
DQ Mixed 1.5
4% 7 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 44%
St12000n M0008-2H3101 12TB
50GB free
Firmware: 8136
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 157 154 153 154 156 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
29.2% Poor
Read 222
Write 199
Mixed 160
SusWrite 154
41% 184 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 11.7
4K Mixed 1.5
39% 11.3 MB/s
DQ Read 3.9
DQ Write 9.9
DQ Mixed 1.5
3% 5.1 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 40%
Seagate ST16000N M001G-2KK103 16TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 8136
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 203 196 194 196 196 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 102%
Seagate ST16000VN001-2RV103 16TB
1TB free
Firmware: SC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 125 124 128 129 127 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 5% Great: 138%
External USB3.0 1TB
608GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 96 98 98 97 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 99.3
Write 98.2
Mixed 35
SusWrite 97
60% 82.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 72%
JMicron Generic DISK00 12TB
79GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 14 68 2.6 2.3 2.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 136
Write 140
Mixed 152
SusWrite 16.4
146% 111 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 1.4
270% 8.2 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 109%
JMicron Generic DISK01 12TB
86GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.2 0.1 0.6 2.2 2.1 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 195
Write 171
Mixed 142
SusWrite 3.6
159% 128 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.5
298% 8.57 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 100%
JMicron Generic DISK02 12TB
310GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 179 176 173 174 170 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 124
Write 114
Mixed 120
SusWrite 174
184% 133 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 1.3
233% 6.53 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 78%
JMicron Generic DISK03 12TB
337GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.2 0.1 0.6 2.3 2.1 16 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.7% Below average
Read 139
Write 130
Mixed 184
SusWrite 3.6
151% 114 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 1.2
245% 7.3 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 42%
JMicron Generic DISK04 12TB
274GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 166 110 174 175 170 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
90.5% Outstanding
Read 245
Write 217
Mixed 182
SusWrite 161
266% 201 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.7
299% 8.63 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CTD 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
87% Excellent
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 33.8
MC Mixed 28.6
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 34
SC Mixed 24.2
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 87%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 1,938 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming - $165

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $650
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback