Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	39.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING (all builds)
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191127
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 14 '20 at 13:02
Run Duration	176 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$211 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	81.1% Excellent	Memory 82.2 1-Core 107 2-Core 215 76% 135 Pts	4-Core 429 8-Core 843 75% 636 Pts	64-Core 1,150 71% 1,150 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 81.1% Great: 80%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 3 239GB 109 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 143GB free (System drive) Firmware: 9.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 169 166 167 169 166 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	39.1% Below average	Read 302 Write 222 Mixed 190 SusWrite 168 49% 220 MB/s	4K Read 8.6 4K Write 11.9 4K Mixed 11.2 34% 10.6 MB/s	DQ Read 84.7 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 80 78% 119 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 109%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 860 500GB 227 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 355GB free Firmware: RVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 157 154 154 155 160 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	46.3% Average	Read 373 Write 422 Mixed 400 SusWrite 155 76% 338 MB/s	4K Read 11.4 4K Write 9.3 4K Mixed 12.5 38% 11.1 MB/s	DQ Read 130 DQ Write 316 DQ Mixed 172 146% 206 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 98%
Amd-raid Array 1 2TB 1,574 User benchmarks, average bench 136% 258GB free Firmware: 9.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 172 172 172 172 173 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 176 Write 185 Mixed 85.7 SusWrite 172 113% 155 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.7 160% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 212%
213 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 23GB free, PID 5400 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 5.4 6.3 6.3 6.3 6 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	8.71% Terrible	Read 39 Write 10.5 Mixed 4 SusWrite 5.8 15% 14.8 MB/s	4K Read 6.3 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0 27% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.71% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$36 287,720 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	106% Outstanding	MC Read 43.9 MC Write 38.4 MC Mixed 33 110% 38.4 GB/s	SC Read 24.3 SC Write 41.3 SC Mixed 30.3 91% 32 GB/s	Latency 76.5 52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,628 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 80%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $140

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,405x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	540x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	533x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	318x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	227x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	207x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	174x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	171x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	135x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	245x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	183x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	156x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $673

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16