Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive247% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X  (all builds)
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200528
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '20 at 19:05
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$138
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Memory 79.1
1-Core 152
2-Core 299
95% 177 Pts
4-Core 586
8-Core 1,008
97% 797 Pts
64-Core 1,387
86% 1,387 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 140
Parallax 132
106% 134 fps
MRender 108
Gravity 129
Splatting 104
92% 114 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 101%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid ADATA SX8200PNP 512GB
331GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42A4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1531 1300 791 606 608 701 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
247% Outstanding
Read 2,475
Write 2,063
Mixed 1,536
SusWrite 923
390% 1,749 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 62.2
219% 85.7 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 875
DQ Mixed 230
263% 427 MB/s
Poor: 100%
This bench: 247%
Great: 247%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$87
24GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,085
Write 1,408
Mixed 396
284% 1,296 MB/s
4K Read 44
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 49.4
208% 80.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,095
DQ Write 1,036
DQ Mixed 664
608% 931 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Amd-raid KINGSTON SHFS37A 240GB
101GB free
Firmware: 60AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 138 138 140 142 143 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 363
Write 214
Mixed 223
SusWrite 140
52% 235 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 55.5
4K Mixed 23.9
92% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 41.1
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 60.2
50% 70.1 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 61%
Amd-raid ST1000DM010-2EP1 1TB
671GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 175 188 188 183 190 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 190
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 183
112% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 108%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 3000 C15 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
MC Read 35.8
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 35
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 25.7
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 35
79% 27.5 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 GAMING X Builds (Compare 4,079 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $694
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback