Today's hottest deals

MSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics65.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C35
MotherboardMSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35)  (all builds)
Memory20.4 GB free of 28 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200116
Uptime8.2 Days
Run DateOct 02 '20 at 18:53
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Memory 80.1
1-Core 146
2-Core 296
93% 174 Pts
4-Core 488
8-Core 827
80% 657 Pts
64-Core 962
60% 962 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
MSI(1462 8A9C) 1GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
16% Very poor
Lighting 19.9
Reflection 16.3
Parallax 17.1
16% 17.8 fps
MRender 23.2
Gravity 18.2
Splatting 17
16% 19.5 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16%
Great: 16%
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
65.5% Good
Lighting 84.9
Reflection 83.4
Parallax 76.8
69% 81.7 fps
MRender 67.5
Gravity 73.2
Splatting 72.6
58% 71.1 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 480GB
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 59 58 49 40 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 378
Write 254
Mixed 227
SusWrite 53.2
50% 228 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 19.9
4K Mixed 14.6
48% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 42.6
DQ Write 70.6
DQ Mixed 23.5
27% 45.6 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36%
Great: 166%
Amd-raid Array 3 499GB
27GB free
Firmware: 9.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,604
Write 1,720
Mixed 1,626
438% 1,984 MB/s
4K Read 50.4
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 66
215% 72.6 MB/s
DQ Read 511
DQ Write 1,329
DQ Mixed 795
642% 878 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 288%
Amd-raid Array 2 1TB
50GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 104 109 112 97 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 124
Write 131
Mixed 94.5
SusWrite 106
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
243% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD M378A1K43CB2-CTD M378A1K43CB2-CTD M378A5244CB0-CRC 28GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
84% Excellent
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 34.7
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 23.5
SC Write 23.3
SC Mixed 31.4
74% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35) Builds (Compare 2,182 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35) - $330

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,493
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback