Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory20.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateDec 23 '22 at 18:43
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3600 How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 63.9
1-Core 130
2-Core 246
79% 147 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 702
72% 579 Pts
64-Core 814
50% 814 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$387
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
106% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 132
Parallax 131
109% 133 fps
MRender 162
Gravity 120
Splatting 106
103% 129 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 106%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5,296
Write 5,270
Mixed 5,271
1,181% 5,279 MB/s
4K Read 387
4K Write 257
4K Mixed 156
924% 267 MB/s
DQ Read 1,328
DQ Write 831
DQ Mixed 906
722% 1,022 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$117
101GB free
Firmware: 4B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,080
Write 2,077
Mixed 2,002
459% 2,053 MB/s
4K Read 56.4
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 74.6
249% 86.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,244
DQ Write 993
DQ Mixed 1,081
819% 1,106 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
656GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 114 115 114 115 114 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 144
Write 140
Mixed 78.8
SusWrite 114
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$82
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 164 163 162 165 160 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 147
Write 150
Mixed 68.8
SusWrite 163
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
76% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
58.3% Above average
MC Read 23
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 23.5
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 19.9
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING Builds (Compare 4,740 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $1,047
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback