Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 50% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	55.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	7.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170407
Uptime	2.8 Days
Run Date	Apr 17 '17 at 07:21
Run Duration	419 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	78.3% Very good	Memory 72.8 1-Core 114 2-Core 226 76% 138 Pts	4-Core 449 8-Core 841 77% 645 Pts	64-Core 1223 76% 1223 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 78.3% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% XFX(1682 9480) CLim: 1338 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.4.2 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	55.6% Above average	Lighting 70.6 Reflection 70.2 Parallax 85.8 58% 75.5 fps	MRender 69.3 Gravity 66.5 Splatting 56.9 52% 64.2 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109 51,792 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 84GB free Firmware: DXT09B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 22899 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1512 (B1) Unknown 81 81 222 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 45 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 635 (F1) Unknown 99 99 28405551785
Poor: 46% Great: 73%
Adata XPG SX900 128GB-$103 6,500 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 84GB free Firmware: 5.8.2a Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 176927116 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 72 72 6768868483844 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1164 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 709 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 37 56 1009320984613 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 176927116 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 176927116 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 176927116 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 4474 (EA) Unknown 0 0 1999 (F1) Unknown 0 0 1999 (F2) Unknown 0 0 20549
Poor: 51% Great: 82%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 46GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8231 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 53 (B1) Unknown 98 98 34 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 58 50 42 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 33 (F1) Unknown 99 99 17055177894	104% Outstanding	Read 511 Write 389 Mixed 406 97% 435 MB/s	4K Read 41.9 4K Write 77.9 4K Mixed 43.8 161% 54.5 MB/s	DQ Read 257 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 101 108% 181 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 297GB free Firmware: CC27 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 165825896 (03) Spinup time 96 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2480 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 79 60 98323308 (09) Power-on hours count 73 73 24318 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 705 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 86 86 14 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295032835 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 48 723451944 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1572 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 435458 (C2) HDA temperature 40 52 55834574888 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 24 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 24 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 3 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 53983443966148 (F1) Unknown 100 253 40643796173 (F2) Unknown 100 253 37195418243	98.8% Outstanding	Read 185 Write 160 Mixed 138 120% 161 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.34 4K Mixed 0.27 72% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 98.8% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 203GB free Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 124375768 (03) Spinup time 96 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 378 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 72 60 20768722 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 10178 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 52 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 1 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 56 740229158 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 17 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1870 (C2) HDA temperature 38 44 68719476774 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -49151605726155 (F1) Unknown 100 253 9101789364 (F2) Unknown 100 253 31666491905	60.2% Good	Read 106 Write 104 Mixed 119 83% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.35 4K Mixed 0.2 65% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 114%
ELECOM MF-HMU2 16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 14GB free, PID 6006 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	6.05% Terrible	Read 23.1 Write 2.97 Mixed 5.29 10% 10.5 MB/s	4K Read 8.64 4K Write 0.006 4K Mixed 0.005 32% 2.88 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.05% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FBR1 2x8GB 785 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	79.2% Very good	MC Read 31.5 MC Write 27.6 MC Mixed 27.3 82% 28.8 GB/s	SC Read 19.4 SC Write 28.5 SC Mixed 22.6 67% 23.5 GB/s	Latency 95.1 42% 95.1 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	100x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	88x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	75x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	70x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	49x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $79Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	37x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $1,056

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)