Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory6.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200814
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 26 '20 at 15:21
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$137
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Memory 91
1-Core 146
2-Core 244
91% 160 Pts
4-Core 553
8-Core 910
89% 732 Pts
64-Core 1,389
86% 1,389 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 97%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$266
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Lighting 139
Reflection 120
Parallax 209
113% 156 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 133
Splatting 168
118% 140 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 112%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WD60EDAZ-11BMZB0 6TB
551GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 90 91 91 93 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Read 104
Write 112
Mixed 77
SusWrite 91.1
22% 96 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 7.9
4K Mixed 0.7
8% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 29%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 464
Write 404
Mixed 354
91% 407 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 84.6
4K Mixed 54.1
176% 59.8 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 150
113% 151 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$54
500GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 113 114 117 124 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 121
Write 91.8
Mixed 78.5
SusWrite 115
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
80% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 106%
Hitachi HTS543232L9A300 320GB-$49
26GB free
Firmware: FB4OC4DC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 60 59 60 59 59 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
34% Below average
Read 58.8
Write 59.2
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 59.6
39% 52.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 34%
Great: 34%
HGST HTS 721010A9E630 1TB
868GB free, PID 8014
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 31 35 36 36 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 37.5
Write 29.8
Mixed 24
SusWrite 35.4
42% 31.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
29% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
V-Color TL8G36818D-E6PRSWK 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 41.1
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 40.7
103% 36.2 GB/s
SC Read 27.8
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 37.5
88% 30.7 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 101%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,940 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $944
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback