Today's hottest deals

MSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics60.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200703
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 01 '20 at 17:36
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
79.9% Very good
Memory 79.1
1-Core 113
2-Core 227
78% 140 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 743
71% 588 Pts
64-Core 928
57% 928 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
EVGA(3842 2287) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
60.3% Good
Lighting 59.7
Reflection 116
Parallax 59.7
49% 78.4 fps
MRender 194
Gravity 73.7
Splatting 59.7
83% 109 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$79
141GB free
Firmware: M3CR010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 261 264 267 260 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Read 364
Write 356
Mixed 338
SusWrite 234
73% 323 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 67.8
4K Mixed 42.9
140% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 201
152% 205 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 125%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$147
242GB free
Firmware: M3CR032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 388 394 408 395 404 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 427
Mixed 393
SusWrite 396
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 67.9
4K Mixed 44.3
143% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 186
144% 199 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 124%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$87
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,820
Write 1,257
Mixed 595
269% 1,224 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 85.3
4K Mixed 49.9
167% 57.8 MB/s
DQ Read 793
DQ Write 556
DQ Mixed 566
452% 639 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB (2019)-$40
34GB free
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,765
Write 2,016
Mixed 1,532
396% 1,771 MB/s
4K Read 46.5
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 62.2
213% 75.9 MB/s
DQ Read 879
DQ Write 520
DQ Mixed 722
532% 707 MB/s
Poor: 143% Great: 238%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$80
387GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 107 106 106 106 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 98.9
Write 100
Mixed 73.4
SusWrite 105
70% 94.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
201% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90
777GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 101 101 101 102 102 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 104
Write 103
Mixed 72.1
SusWrite 100
70% 95 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 96%
Toshiba MK2555GSXF 250GB
232GB free
Firmware: FH305B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 76 76 76 76 76 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 74.8
Write 75.5
Mixed 43
SusWrite 75.4
49% 67.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 43%
Adata DashDrive UV128 USB 3.0 16GB
14GB free, PID db8a
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 36 33 24 22 25 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
29.7% Poor
Read 124
Write 27.7
Mixed 25.4
SusWrite 26.7
52% 50.9 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 4.3
224% 5.4 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 40.2
MC Write 38
MC Mixed 35.8
109% 38 GB/s
SC Read 24.7
SC Write 33.9
SC Mixed 27.8
82% 28.8 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 103%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 11,099 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37) - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $979
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback