Asus PRIME X570-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X570-P  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190802
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateDec 21 '20 at 00:46
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 34%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$275
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
81% Excellent
Memory 72.6
1-Core 137
2-Core 267
86% 159 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 857
80% 668 Pts
64-Core 1,318
82% 1,318 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 81%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.9.1
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
100% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 142
Parallax 217
104% 162 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 133
Splatting 95.4
92% 115 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 100%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,249
Write 906
Mixed 815
219% 990 MB/s
4K Read 48.7
4K Write 88.9
4K Mixed 18.9
145% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 330
DQ Write 16.2
DQ Mixed 27
56% 125 MB/s
Poor: 94% Great: 209%
Toshiba HG5d SATA M.2 512GB
73GB free
Firmware: HTLAN102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 103 108 102 107 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 443
Write 386
Mixed 319
SusWrite 114
70% 315 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 30
4K Mixed 19
64% 21.7 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 137
110% 157 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 103%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
466GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 385 368 370 371 371 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Read 433
Write 386
Mixed 373
SusWrite 381
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 66.6
4K Mixed 45.5
136% 46.8 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 200
151% 203 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$79
2TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 39 41 42 42 41 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 60% Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3133 MHz
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
71.9% Very good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 29
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 23.3
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 95.5
42% 95.5 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X570-P Builds (Compare 8,044 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X570-P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $830
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback