PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 59.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 163% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Notebook P7xxTM1 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Notebook P7xxTM1 |
Memory | 53.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190306 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 21 '21 at 13:49 |
Run Duration | 273 Seconds |
Run User | MUS-User |
Background CPU | 23% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
40.6%
Average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
Clevo(1558 7510) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
59.1%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 970 PRO 512GB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 603 752 953 930 1041 1030 MB/s
|
163%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 860 Pro 2TB-$474
1.5TB free
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 293 347 342 364 362 MB/s
|
74.2%
Very good
|
|||
Samsung 860 Pro 2TB-$474
2TB free
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 293 347 342 364 362 MB/s
|
74.1%
Very good
|
|||
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$234
2TB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1452 1521 1493 1512 1509 1170 MB/s
|
204%
Outstanding
|
|||
JetFlash Transcend 64GB
49GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.6 9.5 9.6 MB/s
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown GKE160SO102408-2400 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
42.7%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i9-9900KIntel $403Bench 98%, 354,223 samples | 116x |
Core i7-8700KIntel $199Bench 88%, 746,287 samples | 104x |
Core i7-9700KIntel $275Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 45x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 2080 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 112%, 4,380 samples | 98x |
GTX 1080 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 95%, 17,197 samples | 91x |
GeForce RTX 2070NvidiaBench 89%, 5,557 samples | 68x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 94% - Outstanding | Total price: $501 |