Gigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics15.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive363% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z390 DESIGNARE
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF  (all builds)
Memory29.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210119
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 02 '21 at 20:54
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$405
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 97.4
1-Core 151
2-Core 301
101% 183 Pts
4-Core 604
8-Core 1206
107% 905 Pts
64-Core 1,594
99% 1,594 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 105%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6870
Sapphire(174B 174B) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 16.2.1
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Lighting 21.8
Reflection 21.2
Parallax 19.1
18% 20.7 fps
MRender 14.4
Gravity 15.8
Splatting 11.8
11% 14 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
321GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1112 850 853 847 851 845 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
363% Outstanding
Read 2,752
Write 2,560
Mixed 1948
SusWrite 893
456% 2,038 MB/s
4K Read 81
4K Write 269
4K Mixed 119
417% 156 MB/s
DQ Read 1,668
DQ Write 1,455
DQ Mixed 1,552
1,166% 1,558 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 363%
Great: 340%
Samsung 860 EVO 4TB
1TB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 491 492 491 491 492 491 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
138% Outstanding
Read 517
Write 493
Mixed 472
SusWrite 492
111% 493 MB/s
4K Read 45.9
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 66
228% 83.9 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 357
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 97%
This bench: 138%
Great: 138%
Samsung 860 Evo 4TB-$380
269GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 491 492 491 491 492 491 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
138% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 493
Mixed 469
SusWrite 491
111% 492 MB/s
4K Read 45.7
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 66.2
229% 84.3 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 356
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 138%
Great: 133%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$155
488GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 469 467 469 469 470 469 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 472
Mixed 413
SusWrite 469
105% 467 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 54.9
194% 70.5 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 295
239% 338 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 125%
Great: 125%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46
586GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 99 100 101 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 99.6
Write 36.8
Mixed 33.9
SusWrite 99.8
49% 67.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
99% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 39.3
MC Write 39.7
MC Mixed 30.7
104% 36.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 44.7
SC Mixed 32
94% 32.7 GB/s
Latency 48.6
82% 48.6 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 104%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF Builds (Compare 1,716 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $1,042
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback