Asrock 990FX Extreme6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics94.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive158% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock 990FX Extreme6  (all builds)
Memory20.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 08 '21 at 17:47
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 29%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9370-$194
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
61.3% Good
Memory 78.2
1-Core 71
2-Core 131
57% 93.5 Pts
4-Core 241
8-Core 410
40% 325 Pts
64-Core 406
25% 406 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$271
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 108
Parallax 113
97% 114 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 104
Splatting 92.4
89% 111 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$60
896GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 32B3T8EA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 568 619 738 754 769 764 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
158% Outstanding
Read 977
Write 673
Mixed 892
SusWrite 702
182% 811 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 83.6
4K Mixed 57.5
186% 61.9 MB/s
DQ Read 474
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 430
317% 419 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 158%
Great: 372%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
169GB free
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 183 208 206 211 207 MB/s
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.7% Above average
Read 239
Write 218
Mixed 202
SusWrite 194
48% 213 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 55.7
4K Mixed 15.1
80% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 35.4
57% 110 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 100%
WDC WDS100T2B0B-00YS70 1TB
637GB free
Firmware: 415020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 186 214 212 217 213 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
64.2% Good
Read 237
Write 217
Mixed 204
SusWrite 198
48% 214 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 54.7
4K Mixed 34.3
114% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 157
118% 158 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 115%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
356GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 110 89 92 72 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 136
Write 130
Mixed 66
SusWrite 94.6
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$79
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 29 17 15 17 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 96.1
Write 77.9
Mixed 32.2
SusWrite 19.7
41% 56.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.6
191% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 90%
SanDisk Cruzer 64GB
39GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 35 37 36 35 35 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 34.9
Write 34
Mixed 31.4
SusWrite 35.2
46% 33.9 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 5.3
366% 5.63 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot PSD38G16002 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.1% Below average
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 11.6
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 11
27% 9.53 GB/s
Latency 84
48% 84 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 990FX Extreme6 Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Extreme6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $260
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback