MSI X470 GAMING PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B79
Motherboard	MSI X470 GAMING PLUS (all builds)
Memory	8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180329
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Apr 17 '21 at 17:27
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	18%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185 123,820 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.65 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	66.2% Good	Memory 72.3 1-Core 93.5 2-Core 175 65% 114 Pts	4-Core 324 8-Core 618 56% 471 Pts	64-Core 1,074 66% 1,074 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Zotac(19DA 2454) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.72 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 37.9 Reflection 42 Parallax 39.1 31% 39.7 fps	Gravity 39 Splatting 28.3 29% 33.7 fps
Poor: 27% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB 26,055 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT21B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 488 Write 311 Mixed 295 81% 365 MB/s	4K Read 28.3 4K Write 64.3 4K Mixed 32.5 119% 41.7 MB/s	DQ Read 330 DQ Write 269 DQ Mixed 246 199% 281 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 126%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 2TB 21,039 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 409GB free Firmware: 0108 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 75 80 79 80 80 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	36.7% Below average	Read 48.1 Write 90.7 Mixed 85.7 SusWrite 78.8 57% 75.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 0.6 180% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 67%
Seagate ST2000DM005-2CW102 2TB 18,723 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 83 76 89 89 82 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	36.6% Below average	Read 48.5 Write 96.9 Mixed 60.1 SusWrite 78.9 53% 71.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 63% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB 46,470 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	70.6% Very good	MC Read 28.4 MC Write 23.9 MC Mixed 25.4 74% 25.9 GB/s	SC Read 17.2 SC Write 20.4 SC Mixed 20 55% 19.2 GB/s	Latency 96.2 42% 96.2 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X470 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,497 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Yacht

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 44%

Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS - $239

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,176x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	751x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	645x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	323x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	283x
RTX 2060Nvidia $296Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	225x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $79Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	207x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	147x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	134x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	357x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	205x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $35Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	168x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $706

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16